stewarty

2 hours ago, Uilleam said:

I wasn't suggesting that he'd understand the term.

 

Anyway, in their current predicament, is somebody called Drysdale the right man for the job. 

The real question is whether Eric had Dale's consent?

2 minutes ago, Uilleam said:

Wait until Drysdale learns the word "microclimate". 

I'm sceptical.  They're still trying to figure out how to use email

5 hours ago, Gonzo79 said:

Gave it to Matondo for the best moment of the match.  

Yep.  My thoughts also.

I think at Lundstram's age we would surely just be looking at a one or two year extension only?  That seemed to be the model for Arfield, Jack, McGregor and one or two others in recent years.  Saying that, I could well see that he wants to secure a long term deal and that might mean him moving on.

Hibs have a cheek to complain with the way the kettle away supporters and delay entrance to Easter road.   There’s a serious accident waiting to happen there.   I’m only surprised it hasn’t already happened. 

Silva here too.  Just thought he was the difference when it came to the goals, he was a constant threat and did a mountain of running.  

Agree - 3 x tough fixtures.  Going to need a player or two to show up with some extra quality in the final third of the pitch.

I fancy Dessers and Fabio to show up well though, and its about time we had a few cameo goals from Roofe.

9 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Sets a really bad precedent. 

I can smell a referee strike coming on...

2 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Interesting looking at the GPL threads many posters have him down as FGS often. Supporters believe in him now and its deserved.

The difference in him since those first few games of the season is incredible.  He was lumbering, lacked sharpness and confidence.  Now he's the complete opposite, albeit he has a bit of the Kenny Millers about him when he is 1v1 with the keeper and has time to think.

Super Jack Butland in goals!

Without that save we were dropping points.

Was always the fear in advance that we concede the first goal as it plays into the hands of Killie's game plan perfectly.  Thankfully it happened early enough in the game that we were able to turn it around.  Credit has to go to the players for adapting, albeit some better than others.

For me the swap of Dessers for Silva was key.  Too many balls in the first half were going long into Silva who either wasn't getting on the end at all, or was outmuscled.

But it was the 3 bits of quality in relatively short order that won the game.  Butland's save, then then two goals.  Clement earning his stripes yet again by making the changes necessary.  

A fast start and another early goal please Mohamed Diomande!

Terrific first half.  Finding a new gear when in front, is exactly what we all wanted to see.  More second half please!

Keep it tight in Lisbon, go for it at Ibrox!

We've a decent record vs Portuguese sides.  Lets go!

43 minutes ago, Tannochsidebear said:

A very difficult one this week, with no real standout for me. Always a bit more difficult watching on tv as well as you dont see the whole game for the work put in off the ball for example, as I was in Lanzarote for the last week and so had to make do with the welcoming and fantastic Bluebells Bar in Puerto Del Carmen which I would highly recommend to any bears that find their way near there during the season. A very poor pitch and another cheat of a referee (where does Peter find them?) were the standout performers but neither in our favour or in a positive manner, so I will give the vote to the captain who joined Greig as our highest scoring defender of all time in just a fraction of the time it took our so-called "greatest ever" to get there. 

Would also endorse the Bluebells Bar for any bears heading to Lanzarote 

Diomande for that bit of quality to get us ahead - St J were really stodgy

The centre half union vote sees me go with Souttar.

Well said Stenny.

1 minute ago, Gonzo79 said:

I hope you're right but won't hold my breath.

Aye.   My optimism has been unfounded in the past 🤣

Just now, Gonzo79 said:

I don't get the interest, in all honesty.  You'd have to be a total moon-unit to think this lot have any integrity.  

 

Even if they get rid of Doncaster, he'll just be replaced by someone similar.

To my mind, if it was just us against the whole of Scottish football like it has been in recent times, then yes it would be easily shunted to the sidelines.

This time though, its at least half of the top league clubs and there is yet more allegations of improper conduct and manipulation of facts.  

I get your sense of futulity but eventually the tide does turn, I'm just sensing something different this time.

One aspect alleged is that the SPFL exec amended the version of the report that has been selectively distributed to clubs.  If that is true, the authors Henderson Loggie will be absolutely fuming.

This story has more legs.

47 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

Incredible Doncaster has lasted so long in his position at the SPFL and SPL before that. His record is abysmal. 
He seems to keep such a low profile nowadays. McLennan too

Useful idiots and both prepared to do the bidding for others.  

The noose around the McLennan and Doncaster nexus of influence is tightening.  

The response from the usual suspects will be illuminating.

At least they can't just say: its just that Rangers lot moaning 

11 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

Don’t forget too that when the Stade de Gadd got rebuilt nearly 30 years ago the cheapest materials were used including Bulgarian steel was it? Maybe some of these materials reaching the end of their working life. Could be a new or rebuilt Stade de Gadd May be required 

Interestingly, as I was doing a quick skim through their annual report, they list obtaining/retaining the safety certificate for their stadium as one of their principal risks and uncertainties.  Take from that what you will.

So their disclosure on provisions says...

and...

Neatly worded.  Their balance sheet date is 30th June, and it was well after that when news came out in relation to the potential negotiations on a settlement.  A cynic might conclude the timing of such an announcement to be deliberate so as to avoid disclosure.

You could also read into the reference to insurance, though I'm not sure how that would work or even who would insure them for such a liability.