North Rd 0 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/4824-for-the-avoidance-of-doubt 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chibmark 15 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 The site is down. What's the jist of it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 The site is down. What's the jist of it? the daily reccord are pricks so is jack irvine as are obsessed trolocs. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 0 Posted August 17, 2013 Author Share Posted August 17, 2013 RANGERS Football Club is aware of wildly inaccurate stories circulating on various websites and would like fans to know that these flights of fantasy will be monitored by our lawyers. In particular, they are examining a malicious piece which seems to suggest that the Club does not own its facilities. We urge Rangers fans to treat these idiotic and lumbering articles with the contempt they deserve. Better still, ignore them completely. But we must also stress we cannot waste time responding publicly to every blog or ridiculous claim against this Club. Also, there is a dangerous proliferation of anonymous obsessives on various social media sites and we will not give them any credence. Nor can we react to every journalist and publication who appear to pursue an anti-Rangers agenda, publications such as the Daily Record which today boasts yet another headline which does not accurately reflect what manager Ally McCoist said in his press conference yesterday. This paper's intent is clear and we urge our fans to see it for what it is. If Rangers fans want the truth they will find it only on the Club's official platforms. Finally, Jack Irvine of Media House does not speak for this Club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeAndMyWeePalJoe 12 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 The site is down. What's the jist of it? The club owns it's facilities contrary to internet rumours. The club can't respond to every obsessive blog post but will monitor these things. Daily Record pursues an anti-Rangers agenda and fans should see that for what it is... Jack Irvine of Media House does not speak for this Club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 wasn't the rumour more that they were looking to sell the assets. i would rather they categorically denied that ans involved lawyers. that said i don't really see it happening. mostly due to green losing control mind you but it remains a fear. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acemcl 0 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 A strongly worded article & a thinly veiled calling for a boycott of the Daily Record. I would temper my enthusiasm that issuing a threat of legal action is greatly diminished when you never actually carry out that threat ... look at Whyte, ridiculed because he threatened but never followed through with it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Pretty confusing stuff from the 'Club' regarding the Daily Record when it's perfectly clear that one half of our recent boardroom battles were using the Record as an outlet and a way to get information out to the fans. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 Pretty confusing stuff from the 'Club' regarding the Daily Record when it's perfectly clear that one half of our recent boardroom battles were using the Record as an outlet and a way to get information out to the fans. It's sad when we don't know whether to believe the Clubs Website. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,127 Posted August 17, 2013 Share Posted August 17, 2013 It's a very strong statement but merely more words without action so easily dismissed by the people's it's aimed at. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.