Andy Muirhead's Shitzine interviews Jack Irvine!!!

[BEARGER 1,829]

Published on September 2nd, 2013 by Andy Muirhead

 

With all eyes on Rangers football club currently, due to the continued ‘political’ infighting between shareholders and the fan base, public relations for the club is needed more than ever. However, even the PR company used by Rangers – Media House – has come under much criticism and increasing calls from Rangers supporters to be sacked due to comments attributed to Jack Irvine, executive chairman of Media House.

 

Scotzine editor Andy Muirhead caught up with Jack Irvine, amid a busy schedule for the PR guru, to discuss his time at Rangers and those who are criticising him.

 

AM: When did you start working with Rangers Football Club?

 

JI: 2006. There had been huge sectarian issues and the football authorities were going to hammer Rangers. There was a danger the team would be playing in empty stadia and face crippling fines. We worked with the legal team to articulate the initiatives from Martin Bain’s management team to curb the sectarian excesses which in turn lessened the possible draconian punishments.

 

AM: We heard from Sir David Murray that he was duped by Craig Whyte in purchasing Rangers from the former Rangers owner – from your point of view and of working with Craig Whyte would you agree with Murray’s statement?

 

JI: Yes I do agree with Sir David. He was led to believe that Craig Whyte was worth in the region of £80million and he had no reason to doubt that.

 

The Bank of Scotland and their boardroom representative saw no problem with Whyte as a buyer and, in fact, couldn’t get the club sold quickly enough. Craig Whyte appeared to be the answer to all of David Murray’s problems.

 

AM: You represented Rangers under Craig Whyte’s tenure at the club which ended with it going into administration and subsequently liquidation – looking back what are your thoughts on your role and Media House’s role during that time?

 

JI: It was a surreal time. I tried to explain to Craig Whyte that he couldn’t possibly run the club himself and I even introduced him to the former Newcastle United Chief Executive Freddie Fletcher who was also a former Rangers man. Freddie would have been magnificent but Craig decided he could do the job himself.

 

Like many businessmen he was totally consumed by The Blue Mist the minute he walked into the boardroom. Media House’s role was what it had always been. Represent the club and its board and attempt to present the good side of the club to the media and public at large. Of course the bad started to outweigh the good very quickly and it was like pushing water uphill.

 

AM: There has been allegations made that Media House and Rangers used friendly journalists to publish positive stories about Rangers and Craig Whyte in particular hiding the truth about the Motherwell businessman – what do you have to say about those allegations?

 

JI: Of course we promoted positive stories – that’s what PR people do the world over. However it didn’t take long for my old newspaper colleagues – and more importantly certain influential bloggers – to find out the truth about Craig Whyte and tell the world. There is no way I could have covered that up or would even have tried to. The dam had burst.

 

AM: Many Rangers fans are now seeing Media House and yourself as culpable in the demise of Rangers under Whyte and are against your continued involvement at the Ibrox club – claiming that you are not there to represent the club but elements on the board? What is your take on this – what is your role at Rangers?

 

JI: That is utter nonsense. We can only work with the tools we are given. Craig Whyte ran the club into the ground although you would have to say he inherited a pretty leaky vessel. Our role at Rangers is crystal clear. We carry out the wishes of the board in an attempt to help the business survive and prosper.

 

However much I sympathise with the agonies the fans are going through, and I speak as one of the original Bond holders, it is not they who instruct me. It is the board. It is naive to think otherwise.

 

AM: A twitter account called Charlotte Fakes has been publishing emails and other correspondence involving you, Whyte, some journalists and Rangers officials – which seem to paint all parties in a bad light. What is your take on what this person is doing?

 

JI: It is illegal. It is a breach of the Data Protection Act and the perpetrator faces serious consequences when he is caught. It is frightening some of the stuff that is going on nowadays on the web. I often wonder what it would have been like in the early 90s when there was the coup to unseat the Celtic board. How would social media have treated that? Would Fergus McCann with his bunnet and squint been given a chance to mount his brilliant strategy or would he have been slaughtered by the fans with laptops?

 

AM: Rangers fans have claimed that the ‘dignified silence’ approach was perpetrated by the likes of Media House and that instead of keeping quiet, you should have gone in all guns blazing. Making demands, threatening legal action etc. What was your approach during Whyte’s reign when negative articles were published?

 

JI: I seem to remember we banned the BBC and if you knew me at all you would know that I am not slow to tell editors and journalists when they are talking bollocks. Lawyers were regularly involved .

 

Do I go out and announce this in the Copland Road to the fans? What do you think? I worked with or trained a lot of the current crop of journalists. I’m not going to publically traduce them although I will make an exception for some of the more stupid ones.

 

AM: Whyte met with several Rangers supporters groups and bloggers who were very friendly to him and backed him to the hilt during his reign at the club – they have now turned on him as if he is the anti-Christ. What is your take on this u-turn by said prominent groups and bloggers?

 

JI: I presume you have certain groups in mind. I can’t think who you are talking about but let’s be fair. The fans loved David Murray then grew to hate him. Ditto Craig Whyte, Ditto Charles Green. So it’s not only bloggers who changed their minds.

 

The economist John Maynard Keynes is alleged to have said, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” If that concept was good enough for him I hardly think we can criticise the bloggers.

 

AM: Given the amount of flak, hassle and abuse you have taken – if you could do it all again would you still represent Rangers and Craig Whyte?

 

JI: I have taken flak, hassle and abuse since May 1987 when I launched The Sun in Scotland. I thrive on it and the more I get the stronger it makes me.

 

The answer to “Would you still represent Rangers” is obviously yes as I have just signed up for another season. I come from an East End Rangers family so I guess I’m stuck with it. Would I represent Craig Whyte? Not if I had known what I know now but it’s easy to be clever after the event as I keep reminding certain fans and journalists. Hindsight is a wonderful gift

.

AM: If you could stand in front of the Rangers fans today and talk to them what about the club and the way it is working and those wanting to take over – what would you say?

 

JI: Give the board a chance. The Chief Executive has sunk a million of his own cash into the club. Fellow director James Easdale and his family have put in even more.

 

Let’s all be mature. I know Frank Blin and Paul Murray are passionate about the club but to quote Mr Churchill: “To jaw jaw is always better than to war war.”

Edited September 2, 2013 by Zappa
formatting

[Zappa 0]

It just gets more bizarre by the day. Now we've got our incompetent board's PR rat doing Q&A sessions with obsessed enemies of our Club.

[26th of foot 5,827]

Jack Irvine proves he is galactically stupid.

 

He has managed to shoot himself in both feet recently; now, he shoots himself in the head.

[RANGERRAB 3,254]

'he was led to believe Craig Whyte was worth £80million and had no reason to doubt that'

 

Don't suppose anyone thought to check this out ?

AJ certainly didn't seem to think so.

Whyte was a man who owned a load of companies none of which seemed to be trading & making any money

 

I've always maintained SDM was forced to sell to Whyte by LBG's Scottish business division who threatened to withdraw financial support to MIH unless he did so.

And who ran LBG's Scottish business division at that time? go on tell me

[andy steel 0]

I just don't believe I read that. I really don't.

 

Driving home I felt grumpy enough as other fans (in England, mostly) enjoyed transfer deadline day, something we've been excluded from for a few years due to debt and then illegal bans. Then AMMS drew my attention to my incipient diabetes/cardiological problems as I ate my supper. And now this.

 

What a complete idiot this man is. How on earth did he achieve success in his chosen field? Everything he has done has been at best crass and at worst self-defeating.

 

Anyone fancy joining me in starting up a PR company? Apparently the only qualifications needed are a brown nose and being a tit...I can cover at least one of those.

[simplythebest 0]

Disgraceful.

[TheTinMan99 0]

Give the board a chance, lol. Guy should be on a stage.

[chilledbear 16]

You know the old saying ......There's a method in his madness.

 

Well I just don't believe JI has given an interview to Muirhead, in his own name, without a very good reason. Knowing his name is dirt to most fans, he has used it, where in the past he has kept in the background.

 

Is he giving the fans a reason for uniting, against himself/the Board? I don't know, but I can't believe he doesn't know what he is doing.

[Frankie 8,145]

Yep, there must be an obvious reason for this amazing and quite deliberate own goal.

[Frankie 8,145]

Let's look at four possible reasons for this interview:

 

1. Deflects from boardroom matters

 

Don't buy this as it just makes the board look increasingly incompetent by supposedly renewing this contract. If anything this increases pressure on the board.

 

2. Positive PR for the board

 

Taking that to it's logical conclusion, the board sack MediaHouse giving them some much-needed fan approval. Seems a rather expensive way of going about PR.

 

3. Irvine character flaw

 

Guy is after as much publicity as possible and is dining out on the attention. This doesn't make sense to me as the guy has barely uttered one word in the seven years previous to his association with Rangers. Why change now?

 

4. An ultimatum to the RFC board

 

Reeling from the adverse publicity over the leaked Greig comments, the RFC board and Easdales attempt to relieve MH of their contract. By speaking to a Celtic fansite (and praising other 'influential anti-RFC bloggers') Irvine lays down a marker by saying, these are the people he goes to with the variety of info he's gleaned during his time working for RFC.

 

 

I'm still none the wiser as, even if we think '4' is the most likely explanation, it still doesn't make sense to thumb your nose so publicly at a company who pays your wages.