the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Purslow is in a different league altogether, he stood up to Hicks & Co at Liverpool and won. Just the type of man we need to sort things out; he would significanlty improve our profile and standing in the football world. But we would need him long term or at least for 3-5 years, not the short term deal he had at Liverpool and what would his salary be? didn't he go to court with he bank to fore gillette and hicks to sell? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossy 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 Naming a new CEO is all very well but without controlling the Board he cannot do very much. So who are the requisitioners proposing to be on the Board in addition to Paul Murray? ps. a wee birdie told me that the AGM could be on October 24th. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted September 28, 2013 Author Share Posted September 28, 2013 Naming a new CEO is all very well but without controlling the Board he cannot do very much. So who are the requisitioners proposing to be on the Board in addition to Paul Murray? ps. a wee birdie told me that the AGM could be on October 24th. Hope you are correct about the agm date. Away most of October but will be here on24th. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 plgsarmy mentioned the AGM might be on the 24th too. If that's the case, then I think they'd need to have accounts out by the 3rd, is that right? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossy 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 plgsarmy mentioned the AGM might be on the 24th too. If that's the case, then I think they'd need to have accounts out by the 3rd, is that right? I am not sure what the rules are with regard to that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 I am not sure what the rules are with regard to that. Neither am I mate, but I've seen quite a few people saying that the 10th would have been the latest date allowed for meeting the 31st Oct' deadline for the AGM. Not sure if that's correct or not, but 21 days seems to be a common factor in these EGM & AGM matters. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 iirc you have to have them out 3 weeks before. the board might as well get them out and start saying their goodbys they are just prolonging the agony. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 the board might as well get them out and start saying their goodbys they are just prolonging the agony. They need time to get their stories straight, prepare bullshit excuses about overspending and to magic up some remotely believable financial projections. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 why bother what investor in their right mind will back a board member that 40k ticket holders want gone. it would be suicide for an investor. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bossy 0 Posted September 28, 2013 Share Posted September 28, 2013 why bother what investor in their right mind will back a board member that 40k ticket holders want gone. it would be suicide for an investor. The key question is whether Rangers will need to go back to the capital markets for more cash. If that is the case then the current Board have a serious problem and their only solution will be to stump up the cash themselves or try to soldier on through asset sales. We will know the answer to that question when the accounts are released. My guess is that the McColl/Murray team have a very good idea of what the real state of play is. They have, no-doubt, got Malcolm Murray and Walter Smith onside and I am sure that there are Ibrox insiders who are friendly to their cause. However, from their point of view, it is risky to speculate - even if it is informed speculation - without having actual facts in hand. A few days ago I postulated that the McColl/Murray team needed to reset their strategy and come up with an alternative management team and Board. From the rumours of a new CEO candidate it sounds like they are doing that. I would not be surprised to see some more names coming forward to flesh out their slate. Naturally, I have forwarded my CV to the interested parties. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.