Murray denies executive salaries claim

[the gunslinger 3,366]

this board are certainly prepared to say or do anything to get rid f anyone who gets in their way. cenkos, mm, jim mccoll.

[trueblue 64 53]

Mr Murray was appointed by Charles Green on June 14 2012 to Sevco Scotland (now Rangers Football Club Ltd). There were no institutions in the Club then. The Club IPO was on December 19 2012 so it is grossly inaccurate to say Mr Murray was put there by said institutions to oversee corporate governance.

 

They also state

Mr Murray negotiated Mr Green’s compromise agreement and signed it off.

 

This suggests to me Murray was solely responsible for Greeens massive payoff.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

i imagine that's what we are supposed to think.

 

but we aren't all that daft.

[craig 5,195]

Mr Murray was appointed by Charles Green on June 14 2012 to Sevco Scotland (now Rangers Football Club Ltd). There were no institutions in the Club then. The Club IPO was on December 19 2012 so it is grossly inaccurate to say Mr Murray was put there by said institutions to oversee corporate governance.

 

They also state

Mr Murray negotiated Mr Green’s compromise agreement and signed it off.

 

This suggests to me Murray was solely responsible for Greeens massive payoff.

 

Read both statements again....

 

The Board (and Toxic Jack) are being VERY disingenious with the institutions line. Read what the RFC statement says and what Murray says. Murray says he was appointed on the "recommendation of institutions". The Board say Murray claims he was put in position "by the institutions" - those are two VERY different things.

 

And it is more than reasonable that Green hired Murray because he knew of Murray's London reputation and Green knew he was going the IPO route.

 

So it is very disingenious of the Board to say what they are !!!

 

Also, Murray agreeing it is not necessarily the case either - Murray would have to have signed off but did he really agree ?? Was Murray not gone before Green anyway ?

[plgsarmy 111]

Read both statements again....

 

The Board (and Toxic Jack) are being VERY disingenious with the institutions line. Read what the RFC statement says and what Murray says. Murray says he was appointed on the "recommendation of institutions". The Board say Murray claims he was put in position "by the institutions" - those are two VERY different things.

 

And it is more than reasonable that Green hired Murray because he knew of Murray's London reputation and Green knew he was going the IPO route.

 

So it is very disingenious of the Board to say what they are !!!

 

Also, Murray agreeing it is not necessarily the case either - Murray would have to have signed off but did he really agree ?? Was Murray not gone before Green anyway ?

 

No he wasn't but it's clear to me MM was talking about his appointment to the Board of RIFC after attracting a number of institutional investors, not when Charles Green invited him onto the Sevco Scotland/ RFC Board on which he served alongside the three amigos and was the only NED.

[trueblue 64 53]

Read both statements again....

 

The Board (and Toxic Jack) are being VERY disingenious with the institutions line. Read what the RFC statement says and what Murray says. Murray says he was appointed on the "recommendation of institutions". The Board say Murray claims he was put in position "by the institutions" - those are two VERY different things.

 

And it is more than reasonable that Green hired Murray because he knew of Murray's London reputation and Green knew he was going the IPO route.

 

So it is very disingenious of the Board to say what they are !!!

 

Also, Murray agreeing it is not necessarily the case either - Murray would have to have signed off but did he really agree ?? Was Murray not gone before Green anyway ?

 

Regardless of who said what, the facts are Murray joined the board of Sevco Scotland, a private company. There is no way institutions in London recommended anything to a private company.

 

 

Legally if you sign something you agree with it, he signed Green's and Stockbridges deals.

Murray negotiated with Green over his payoff and gave him close on 2 years salary.

Murray was there with Green, they had several public fallouts.

Murray was removed from the Pinsent Masons investigation for leaking sensitive information, a sackable offence, maybe him and Leggo had a few too many one night.

[plgsarmy 111]

Regardless of who said what, the facts are Murray joined the board of Sevco Scotland, a private company. There is no way institutions in London recommended anything to a private company.

 

 

Legally if you sign something you agree with it, he signed Green's and Stockbridges deals.

Murray negotiated with Green over his payoff and gave him close on 2 years salary.

Murray was there with Green, they had several public fallouts.

Murray was removed from the Pinsent Masons investigation for leaking sensitive information, a sackable offence, maybe him and Leggo had a few too many one night.

 

And in December he joined the Board of the Plc.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

no doubt at the request of the institutions.

[trueblue 64 53]

And in December he joined the Board of the Plc.

 

So he was employed by Rangers for 5months, then at the IPO the institutions said we have a great suggestion.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

brought in to attract hem then appointed to new company to look after them.

 

the two biggest institutional investors are after all trying to get him back on the board.

 

 

its plain to see who's lying.