the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 with the likes of dave king ready and willing to invest there is no reason to languish behind celtc. it's a shame the spivs chased him off but that's something the new guys can rectify. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Lets get financially stable first, even if it means some years of 2nd best, we always get back to the top eventually This is a different ball game these days. Some years as 2nd best will be added their first 4 without us. They will be out of sight if we accept any years of accepting 2nd best. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
amms 0 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 If the controlling shareholders are your issue then the only way to sort that is for them to be bought out surely? The controlling shareholders are always the issue STB, fuxake keep up. For some of us this has nothing to do with whether or not we like the guy who owns Follow Follow. Why aren't the controlling shareholders your issue, that's what I still find bewildering. You really don't need to be an accountant to see that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 The controlling shareholders are always the issue STB, fuxake keep up. For some of us this has nothing to do with whether or not we like the guy who owns Follow Follow. Why aren't the controlling shareholders your issue, that's what I still find bewildering. You really don't need to be an accountant to see that. You mentioned follow follow not me. I thought we were talking about board members hence why I pointed to Wallace's CV, now you've said it's about the shareholders. Fair enough, but as I say, when it comes to forcing change only cold hard cash will do it there. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 oh i think the fans could easily force change if they are minded to do so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 oh i think the fans could easily force change if they are minded to do so.Not really no 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 good luck to the board funding us without the fans. who knows, they may even have to cut out the dinners with their wives at mar hall. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 In the DR interview Wallace seems to talk about adding players in the next two summer transfer windows as we go up the leagues. That will require funding. He needs to explain where that funding will come from if we're looking at cutting players salaries by 15 percent at present. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 In the DR interview Wallace seems to talk about adding players in the next two summer transfer windows as we go up the leagues. That will require funding. He needs to explain where that funding will come from if we're looking at cutting players salaries by 15 percent at present. Could be appeasement Rab. Deflection. Hot air. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 This thread was less than half the pages when I last read it. Has there been some big developments or just a lot of discussion of the initial story? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.