Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

To be fair to all here, there was no way Rangers First was going to be seen as anything other than a challenge to Buy Rangers. But, on here anyway (I don't use other forums), there's been little biting - only one question from Bearger and you've answered them well, TWWC.

 

So it might not be as gloomy as all that...we have to allow for a little tension, surely. It was always going to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No reason why those costs can't be covered outwith member contributions. I'm not sure how the OP got his information though, none of that has even been discussed yet.

 

Eh? What are you talking about regarding where I get my information from? I asked questions about statements made on various forums about both schemes, that was all. I have no inside knowledge from either scheme or have attended any meetings. What information do you mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eh? What are you talking about regarding where I get my information from? I asked questions about statements made on various forums about both schemes, that was all. I have no inside knowledge from either scheme or have attended any meetings. What information do you mean?

 

You said you'd heard costs would be higher, I'm just wondering where from because someone is giving out information which hasn't even been determined yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You said you'd heard costs would be higher, I'm just wondering where from because someone is giving out information which hasn't even been determined yet.

 

Nobody gave me any information, this is what I said "3. BuyRangers and RangersFirst seen it posted elsewhere that more will be used on expenses/costs etc. with RF than BR. Is this correct?" I got that from a post on here or FF or some other forum.

If it's not been determined yet how can somebody have given me the information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody gave me any information, this is what I said "3. BuyRangers and RangersFirst seen it posted elsewhere that more will be used on expenses/costs etc. with RF than BR. Is this correct?" I got that from a post on here or FF or some other forum.

If it's not been determined yet how can somebody have given me the information?

 

Because people want to shit stir about it? Seems like there's a lot of misinformation about a lot of stuff hat hasn't been decide on yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because people want to shit stir about it? Seems like there's a lot of misinformation about a lot of stuff hat hasn't been decide on yet.

 

Yes would think is the case in part. You also get people making assumptions. We will wait and see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.