bluebear54 0 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 This is a bit surreal. I don't really have very many on my ignore list, but the ones who are justify my decision every time. It's so easy to spot when threads like this open up. And then we have the usual suspects who only post when something like this crops up. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Our support is a shambles. The likes of Ryan, and stfu are not alone in their warped view of the situation. Even taking King out of the equation, how anyone can have a shred of support for this joke of a regime is baffling. Hiding behind some perceived loyalty to the club is a cop-out. Sometimes true loyalty is taking a step back and saying wait a fucking minute here. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stfu Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 You bought a bit ergo King bought a bit many thousands of times bigger then? He held shares in the Rangers Football Club plc when it entered administration exactly the same as you, me and circa 26,000 others.... DK shares were in Murray sports were they not? Is that not why D&P chased him when he tried to get creditor status for his £20M. King as far as we know has bought nothing in the new company, if you can show me evidence to the contrary then I will apologise. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 DK shares were in Murray sports were they not?Is that not why D&P chased him when he tried to get creditor status for his £20M. When the Rangers Football Club plc entered administration Dave King held over 5% of the shares that is a fact is it not? King as far as we know has bought nothing in the new company, if you can show me evidence to the contrary then I will apologise. Oh it's company now is it not club?.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Okay guy's This discussion is getting to heated and going in circles. I am going to close the thread for now so that everyone can cool down and get a sleep. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 DK shares were in Murray sports were they not?Is that not why D&P chased him when he tried to get creditor status for his £20M. DK shares were in Murray Sports for most of the period, but towards the end there was a restructure and DK ended up with a proportion of shares in the club itself. I don't recall him trying for a creditor status. Not sure how that would have worked. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 As for the claim that DK has done nothing since we went into administration, it's a valid point, whatever his circumstances. Perhaps he is trying to rectify that now but it's a valid point and everyone should accept it as is the fact that he previously invested £20m in the club. What emphasis each individual places on it is up to themselves but let's not go round in circles on it, which is resulted in the thread being temporarily locked. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 The way I see it, this is just like the pre AGM threads. A lot of good debate and points were lost and stifled in the noise and filibustering from the usual suspects. And so it happens again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 27, 2014 Author Share Posted February 27, 2014 Trying to be little kings previous investment is a strange tactic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Trying to be little kings previous investment is a strange tactic. Not the way I see it, GS. Anyway, be great if we got the discussion back on track. I only made an observation. It wasn't meant to be a discussion point. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.