Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Club deny King's 'Scottish Sun' claims... http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/6414-club-statement Someone is telling porkies 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Dynamo 128 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 1. Will the board provide legally binding assurances that the club is a going concern and has sufficient funds and/or facilities in place for the 2014/2015 season. WE KNOW IT DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT FUNDS 2. Will the board undertake that none of the proceeds from season ticket sales will be used to settle any financial obligation that arose prior to receipt of the season ticket monies by the club. NO, THEY WILL REPAY THE EASDALE AND LAXEY LOANS AS ALREADY STATED 3. Will the board confirm that the club assets continue to be unencumbered. NO, ALBION CAR PARK AND EDMISTON HOUSE ARE ENCUMBERED IN RECENT LOANS 4. Will the board explain its previous statements that the club had sufficient cash resources to last until the end of the season. OF COURSE NOT, THAT WAS A LIE 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Somers? I forgot he was even here. It's alive. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 26, 2014 Author Share Posted February 26, 2014 Someone is telling porkies king hasn't actually said he offered a loan. regardless this statement is dynamite. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,219 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 They should start talking to one another, and not via the media. They called Bayern Munich "FC Hollywood" a wee while back, because players, managers and coaches had similar media "performances". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 297 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 They should start talking to one another, and not via the media. They called Bayern Munich "FC Hollywood" a wee while back, because players, managers and coaches had similar media "performances". I think King has made it clear - no one wants to speak to him within the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 26, 2014 Author Share Posted February 26, 2014 They should start talking to one another, and not via the media. They called Bayern Munich "FC Hollywood" a wee while back, because players, managers and coaches had similar media "performances". he's talking to the people who matter. the season ticket holders. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 (edited) 1. Will the board provide legally binding assurances that the club is a going concern and has sufficient funds and/or facilities in place for the 2014/2015 season. WE KNOW IT DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT FUNDS2. Will the board undertake that none of the proceeds from season ticket sales will be used to settle any financial obligation that arose prior to receipt of the season ticket monies by the club. NO, THEY WILL REPAY THE EASDALE AND LAXEY LOANS AS ALREADY STATED 3. Will the board confirm that the club assets continue to be unencumbered. NO, ALBION CAR PARK AND EDMISTON HOUSE ARE ENCUMBERED IN RECENT LOANS 4. Will the board explain its previous statements that the club had sufficient cash resources to last until the end of the season. OF COURSE NOT, THAT WAS A LIE I liked his statement up to that point; but he is asking for assurances that he KNOWS or ought to know cannot be given; what is the point or purpose in doing that? Edited February 26, 2014 by BrahimHemdani 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 That's quite a damning indictment also noticible is the lack of dimplomatic nicities that were present in King's previous statements. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 26, 2014 Author Share Posted February 26, 2014 In liked his statement up to that point; but he is asking for assurances that he KNOWS or ought to know cannot be given; what is the point or purpose in doing that? yes but encumbrance can be removed and loans can be altered. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.