Club Statement: MediaHouse binned

[the gunslinger 3,366]

But it is a step in the right direction as long as it's not over ruled again like when Mather did it

[aweebluesoandso 290]

Rejoice....

Ding dong, the witch is dead

Which old witch?

The Toxic witch!

Ding dong, the Toxic witch is dead

[aweebluesoandso 290]

A tonne of people said if Stockbridge and Irvine went they'd start to give the new board a chance, let's see if that happens.

 

Sorry but I lied.

[RANGERRAB 3,254]

No love for MH or Irvine but it makes no difference there will just be a new prime target to be chased out

 

As you say glad to see the back of MH but who do these people who were against stockbridge, Irvine etc actually want to run Rangers?

[Darthter 542]

So who's to blame if the quality of statements/spin etc coming from the club doesn't change???

[Zappa 0]

A tonne of people said if Stockbridge and Irvine went they'd start to give the new board a chance, let's see if that happens.

 

The removal of Stockbridge and Irvine was the absolute minimum wish of most of our fans who were commenting online before the AGM in December. The appointment of Somers as Chairman was never particularly popular because it took very little time to see that he's not only a complete buffoon, but also certainly not as independent as he claimed. Then there's Crighton, who was served up to us as an independent financial expert and initially claimed to be completely independent himself, only to later admit that he had actually been recommended by Laxey and is basically their man on the board. On top of that, there were plenty of fans voicing concerns about the Easdales for valid reasons (not just because of the rumours about them).

[Zappa 0]

So who's to blame if the quality of statements/spin etc coming from the club doesn't change???

 

The Rangers directors still employing Irvine & Media House?

[bluebear54 0]

I wonder who sanctioned this. Easdales, Wallace, our Puppetmaster?

After this statement, Green's third coming, and the supposed U-turn on the Laxey loan, am I right in thinking that the Board and those behind them are getting nervous?

[the gunslinger 3,366]

As you say glad to see the back of MH but who do these people who were against stockbridge, Irvine etc actually want to run Rangers?

 

Competent non thieves. Preferably not Dundee Utd or Aberdeen fans. In fact definitely a rangers fan as chairman at very least.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

I wonder who sanctioned this. Easdales, Wallace, our Puppetmaster?

After this statement, Green's third coming, and the supposed U-turn on the Laxey loan, am I right in thinking that the Board and those behind them are getting nervous?

 

What u turn?