RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Fair point, Walter.Don't see our management team lasting long if he takes control. Ashley has previous in being ruthless. He'd set much higher performance targets for a start which they could never achieve. You're spot on 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 He'd set much higher performance targets for a start which they could never achieve. You're spot on laughable stuff. he wants to buy us. get us in the cl and make money out of it. good luck to him. Why not ? If Rangers were run properly with the right people in charge it should be a profitable business 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Why not ? If Rangers were run properly with the right people in charge it should be a profitable business and how will you extract a profit and still stay above celtc. it will cost 50 million to catch up if your lucky you might turn a profit of a million a year. how old is ashley? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 A decent manager could assemble a team to challenge them without spending much. Spending anything like that when we get back up there would be suicidal. I'd rather get hammered by the tims than put ourselves financially at risk again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 He'd set much higher performance targets for a start which they could never achieve. You're spot on and how will you extract a profit and still stay above celtc. it will cost 50 million to catch up if your lucky you might turn a profit of a million a year. how old is ashley? It won't cost anywhere near £50m to catch up with Celt@c 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 It won't cost anywhere near £50m to catch up with Celt@c Given we have no scouts, make a lot of poor signings and don't have a decent manager, it probably will cost at least that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 No thanks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Minimum 50 million. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 6, 2014 Share Posted April 6, 2014 Make that 60. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,234 Posted April 6, 2014 Author Share Posted April 6, 2014 Well, many a players' contract will run out in one or two years, so no fear that we'll have to see anything like today for the medium term future. Likewise, it's not that the Yahoos are littered with quality. They are just about good enough to beat the top tier teams and their "quality players" won't stay forever either. In this day and age you don't actially have "to pay" 40 or 50m to assemble a good squad, if you know the way and find some quality folk as well. While our current set up is hardly ideal, who can say for sure what happens between now and Autumn 2015 (on either side of the Clyde, BTW). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.