A more liberal look at the board and recent campaigning

[Ser Barristan Selmy 222]

And that is actually the main problem. Nigh everyone equates the ongoings of and at the old boards with the current one, even - e.g. in Gough's case - claim that they shed 60odd million of ST and IPO money. There are inaccuracies galore and half-truths thrown about yet go hardly undisputed (by the anti-board faction), whereas anything the board does is put on a pair of gold scales. That is what the chap points at with his article and is - right on cue - ridiculed.

If his article wasn't utterly ridiculous perhaps he would not be ridiculed.

[andy steel 0]

I'm afraid the line about altruism will hang around Danny's neck!

 

Whatever the reasons for misleading statements - by people on this board, dB, not the last one - it certainly isn't altruism.