BEARGER 1,829 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 @Chris_Jack89: Sandy Easdale has threatened legal action against Craig Houston over an online petition. Story in Wednesdays @TheEveningTimes #Rangers 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Professor Watson must be rather busy this week! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Does he do this when people complain about his buses? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Must easdale continue to embarrass rangers? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Must easdale continue to embarrass rangers? As long as he remains a director, he'll do that. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted May 20, 2014 Author Share Posted May 20, 2014 This time they have threatened me with police action for harassment apparently if you open your emails in the morning and find 1,200 from a petition then it causes annoyance, inconvenience and anxiety. These are feelings that we have all felt due to his actions and words recently so its nice to know he will be feeling the same as us all now The fact that by now it will be at over 4,000 may make him feel a little more anxious. Just give us legal assurances and we can all sleep better at night Craig SoS 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 Strange one this because the SoS petition doesn't even mention him. Unfortunately, it's necessary to remind you all that this forum also previously received a threat of legal action from this director's lawyer, so please keep your comments about this subject legal and above reproach folks. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 This time they have threatened me with police action for harassment apparently if you open your emails in the morning and find 1,200 from a petition then it causes annoyance, inconvenience and anxiety. These are feelings that we have all felt due to his actions and words recently so its nice to know he will be feeling the same as us all now The fact that by now it will be at over 4,000 may make him feel a little more anxious. Just give us legal assurances and we can all sleep better at night Craig SoS That does sound pretty much like spamming 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted May 20, 2014 Author Share Posted May 20, 2014 That does sound pretty much like spamming If you say so, I believe it's posting information. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted May 20, 2014 Share Posted May 20, 2014 (edited) This time they have threatened me with police action for harassment apparently if you open your emails in the morning and find 1,200 from a petition then it causes annoyance, inconvenience and anxiety. These are feelings that we have all felt due to his actions and words recently so its nice to know he will be feeling the same as us all now The fact that by now it will be at over 4,000 may make him feel a little more anxious. Just give us legal assurances and we can all sleep better at night Craig SoS 'Harrassment' would IMO be very difficult to make stick given circumstances. Perhaps they want to be embarrassed in court when you go through the details of why a petition/protest is necessary. Perhaps they want to say we are customers of a PLC and not 'loyal supporters' of a football club, as is their want when it suits. Good effort Craig. Keep the good fight going, the 'apolitical large middle rump' of the support don't seem to trust the board either when you look at the ST renewal estimates. This is an important development. Something from earlier Rather than the merits or otherwise of whatever fan group you care to mention, isn't it more important to get as close to the bottom as you can get of the motivations, MO and merits or otherwise of the actual executive board ? I think the most significant issue regards the fans at the moment is not recognized groups as such. It is the large middle rump who up until 2014 have been pretty much apolitical and just followed the team. It is within this group where there has been a change and whilst some will be fed-up with the football, the majority of them no longer have trust in the current board, the way they run the club and their longterm motivations. In other words it's a vote of no-confidence in the board from the customers of the PLC. So if this group is the most important in terms of volume, shouldn't their opinion weigh heavy when considering how to go forward. Their general concerns are close to those of the UoF and when you talk of "meaningful, constructive or informative dialogue with the board" that's all very well but what happens if communications aren't so because the board are disengenuous, misleading and fail to honour such simple things as a phonecall ? Why not forget the divisions, think of the majority of ST holders and concentrate efforts on the executive board ? Edited May 20, 2014 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.