Zappa 0 Posted May 31, 2014 Share Posted May 31, 2014 Zappa, retrospect isn't the issue here. What we had was a reporter of the publicly funded national radio station using an 'exclusive' (from Jack Irvine/RIFC) that stated the AGM vote as being a done deal and also using language that was an effort to disuade shareholders from voting/ there being any point in voting. Irvine/RIFC were attempting to take the heat out of the situation answell as the wind out of opposition sails. There is also the issue of corporate goverence regards the club via an agent allowing the release of such information prior to the AGM itself. Last week we had a half-hearted attempt to put out there that the ST renewals had reached 20,000. I believe the half-heartedness of it refects the accuracy. Oh, I'm with you all the way here because it's not right of them to try to deceive us with spin. I was just pointing out that technically the scoop from Lamont was correct in the sense that our 12% or so fan votes couldn't actually make a difference to the voting on the majority of the AGM resolutions. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted May 31, 2014 Share Posted May 31, 2014 Can you point out the sentences where he "defended" the 70m blow stuff? Just look for the millions that were not specifically addressed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,217 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 Just look for the millions that were not specifically addressed. That is no defence, unless you imply that he knew exactly where it went and to whom. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 That is no defence, unless you imply that he knew exactly where it went and to whom. If he doesn't then he's not doing his job. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 If he doesn't then he's not doing his job. Be fair, he may just have missed it in his rush to get the review out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 Be fair, he may just have missed it in his rush to get the review out. Was that the review that 5 months after joining GW told us that it might be an idea if we get a scouting network but thought it so important he brought in a spin-doctor instead ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 1, 2014 Share Posted June 1, 2014 Was that the review that 5 months after joining GW told us that it might be an idea if we get a scouting network but thought it so important he brought in a spin-doctor instead ? It shows just how bad they are in other areas when something as important as that is hardly worthy of a mention. He should get his jotters for that alone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.