the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 let's be honest here no one is going to trust anything set up by this board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,145 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 let's be honest here no one is going to trust anything set up by this board. Understand the cynicism will will no doubt be shared by many but an important factor will be who sits on the board and the process of their election/term. This is what we've been offered so it's now up to us to ensure it's a worthwhile exercise. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Understand the cynicism will will no doubt be shared by many but an important factor will be who sits on the board and the process of their election/term. This is what we've been offered so it's now up to us to ensure it's a worthwhile exercise. we will have no say in whether it's a worthwhile exercise. do you really think the easdales will listen to one word they say. its a chocolate fireguard, a paper shield. there is literally no way this will have any positive impact on the ****s and most likely will be just a handful of sympathisers used to sell ****ery to the masses. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 i understand your wish to give it a chance but be realistic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 It's a complete sham IMO 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,145 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Pragmatism suggests it probably won't work due to timing and overall trust issues but I think it's unfair to write anything off before we know more. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Perhaps the first point of order for the proletariat member will be to remove the somewhat elitist nature of this board? I'm not following you mate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Do we really need a reverend on the nominations committee? I would prefer us to start with a secular standpoint - and if someone religious (whichever that may be) gets elected then so be it. Aye, it seems a bit weird to me. The Reverend is the Chairman of the committee too. An on-line vote sounds a bit dodgy unless it is validated in some way. They'll need to make the voting private within peoples' accounts or else it would be a total shambles. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,409 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 I smell more bullshit................. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 5,827 Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 As the Grand Pobah of the Brown Fadouk, I demand my snout in the official trough. I have coloured-in the Ladybird edition of Animal Farm, some animals are more equal than others and that's 'official'. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.