BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 But he wasn't. He was in fact offering to bring in 50 million of vital investment. Blackmail pure and simple and it didn't work. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 the 44,000 was a one off - next few home league games will be no more than 30k IMO - at very best. And the Clyde cup game will be around 12k. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 I didn't mention "boycott". I said he was encouraging people not to buy the product; that doesn't mean ALL people as inn boycott and the "product" I was referring to were ST's. BTW I think then 44,000 was a bit more like my estimate than yours, mate, was it not? You can get the price of the Hearts game off your ST if you repent now Bet thousands are queuing up for that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Blackmail pure and simple and it didn't work. Blackmailing them into taking 50 million. Wish he would blackmail me. As for working. I would say he's doing pretty well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 12, 2014 Author Share Posted August 12, 2014 I would be happy if someone came in and said we have a five year plan for Rangers Football Club, as long as it was set out and people could see it was feasible, I don't think anyone expects miracles over 1/2 years. The problem this Board have are the reviews which have decent points, but then they are never implemented, monetary targets which are founded on unrealistic figures and promises of investment, which Board members are being paid to find, which never come to fruition. I would much rather be told we are skint, there are drastic cuts which have to be made [should have been done 2 years ago], than pie in the sky promises which we all know are not worth the paper they were printed on. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 There is definitely something afoot but I very much doubt that there are any negotiations going on right now with the King of SA. Our esteemed Chairman made it clear that he would talk to Mr K when the time was right if a new share issue was approved at the AGM, there really is nothing for them to discuss with him right now unless he has changed his stance on buying shares from the current investors. Silly little comment highlights your lack of balanced thinking on the subject. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Silly little comment highlights your lack of balanced thinking on the subject. He's been called much worse. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 He's been called much worse. Irrelevant what anyone else calls him. I'm highlighting your obvious lack of balance on the subject i.e. anti-King, pro-board all the way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,219 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Irrelevant what anyone else calls him. I'm highlighting your obvious lack of balance on the subject i.e. anti-King, pro-board all the way. Nothing to do with "balance", IMHO. Some call it irony, other might deem it sarcasm. After all we've been through, rather appropriate, either way. Sidenote ... the bipolarisation into anti-King or pro-board is off the mark. Not supporting King wholeheartedly does not make you pro-board. Trying to look at the stuff the board does from a basic business-point of view does not make you anti-King or actually pro-board. It is though the anti-board "faction" who likes to categorize people that way. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Irrelevant what anyone else calls him. I'm highlighting your obvious lack of balance on the subject i.e. anti-King, pro-board all the way. I am not sure how many times I have to tell you that I am not pro-board, I have stated clearly several that they have yet to gain my confidence. In any event as has been highlighted numerous times, being against King's actions does not make one pro-Board nor would it be vice versa. And there is no requirement on here to be balanced, we are not journalists writing a story for the beeb 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.