North Rd 0 Posted September 9, 2014 Author Share Posted September 9, 2014 Front page of DR Easdale and Rafat at Lunch together... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,231 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 You wonder what Interpol does these days, if the DR photographers have better informers? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 0 Posted September 9, 2014 Author Share Posted September 9, 2014 an interview with STV News, Easdale also said former chief executive Charles Green and convicted fraudster Rafat Rizvi were not part of his plans for Ibrox 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,231 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 an interview with STV News, Easdale also said former chief executive Charles Green and convicted fraudster Rafat Rizvi were not part of his plans for Ibrox I take it that this was pre-ST-sale drop and what happened over the summer? Anyhow, the same journo had an article about Rizvi and his talks with Stockbridge et al before. They thus knew what sort of person this was, did they report him to the police while taking snap-shots? If not, does that mean that a) Rivzi is no longer wanted or b) they made themselves guilt of letting him "escape"? Anyway ... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,231 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 And then we have that Malaysian chap himself, i.e. the real news ... Faizoull Bin Ahmad 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 I take it that this was pre-ST-sale drop and what happened over the summer? Anyhow, the same journo had an article about Rizvi and his talks with Stockbridge et al before. They thus knew what sort of person this was, did they report him to the police while taking snap-shots? If not, does that mean that a) Rivzi is no longer wanted or b) they made themselves guilt of letting him "escape"? Anyway ... Interpol cannot do anything to Rizvi in countries that have do not have extradition treaties with Indonesia. No EU country can extradite Rizvi to Indonesia as they have the death penalty. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Through the Hong Kong ruling, Amir said the government would be able to seize US$4.07 million of the total $6.8 million hidden in Hong Kong by the bank’s former owners Hesham al-Warraq, a Saudi Arabian national, and Rafat Ali Rizvi, a British citizen, who were sentenced in absentia to 15 years behind bars in 2011. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/02/19/hong-kong-grants-request-bank-century-asset-recovery.html 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,231 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Interpol cannot do anything to Rizvi in countries that have do not have extradition treaties with Indonesia. No EU country can extradite Rizvi to Indonesia as they have the death penalty. I see, since you sure done your homework on Rivzi, why would Interpol send him in Indonesia? EDIT: Time4change did a better job already. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,145 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 Questions seem fair. Don't hold your breath for answers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 I take it that this was pre-ST-sale drop and what happened over the summer? Anyhow, the same journo had an article about Rizvi and his talks with Stockbridge et al before. They thus knew what sort of person this was, did they report him to the police while taking snap-shots? If not, does that mean that a) Rivzi is no longer wanted or b) they made themselves guilt of letting him "escape"? Anyway ... Why would they be guilty of that ? It isn't the jouirnos job to shop criminals. Sure, morally they should but it isn't a legal obligation. If Easdale had lunch with him is he guilty of letting him escape too ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.