the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 I cannot see the UoF getting into any sort of useful debate with the board if their PR levels don't improve. That said, I doubt that they want that anyway. the uof have the backing of thousands of fans. more than can be said for the board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest govanrab Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Easdale increased his share holding 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Easdale increased his share holding most of the directors did. they really had to or the share issue would have failed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest govanrab Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 3.3million apparently. If Ahmed and loans paid off only buys a month or 2? Ashley out the race now too. Dark days :-( 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 3.3million apparently. If Ahmed and loans paid off only buys a month or 2? Ashley out the race now too. Dark days :-( 400k in fees as well for the issue 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest govanrab Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 God thats bad then. Waste of time really apart from those who increased their share holding in case of a potential pay off if a white night rides in. 1-0 gers get in Clark 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 most of the directors did. they really had to or the share issue would have failed. In their haste to empire build, the fan groups have propped up this share issue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 In their haste to empire build, the fan groups have propped up this share issue. i disagree. we were just over the line and the board bouth just enough. if the rst has payed 33k or whatever less the board would only have proped it up more 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 i disagree. we were just over the line and the board bouth just enough. if the rst has payed 33k or whatever less the board would only htave proped it up more On the RST specifically, I don't see the logic of calling for a boycott to starve them out, while putting money into a share issue which does the opposite. I hope they come out and explain themselves the next time their is a UoF statement. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 On the RST specifically, I don't see the logic of calling for a boycott to starve them out, while putting money into a share issue which does the opposite. I hope they come out and explain themselves the next time their is a UoF statement. they have explained their reasoning. also it's sos calling for a boycott. actually they are polling members about one. but really a boycott is in place unofficially anyway. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.