the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Come on, at no point did SDM step down from controlling the club. He had control taken off him. But anyway we both know that talk of Murray being associated with sdm is a red herring. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,253 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 He once let McClelland take a fall for him, he also claimed Martin Bain "ran" our club "day to day" but of course Murray was still boss until the bank took over. And we know who were in charge of LBG's Scottish business division at the time don't we? Rangers debts at that time were falling (they were circa £30m at one point) and were a fraction of the overall MIH debt. So why were the bank so focused on Rangers debt ? Go figure and please don't give me the 'he wasn't anywhere near our account'. He could easily have a got a lacky to do it for him 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 And we know who were in charge of LBG's Scottish business division at the time don't we? So why were the bank so focused on Rangers debt ? Personally I don't mate. I believe an organised group were out to harm us but of course I have no proof. That's just my guess. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,219 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 That, Rab, and the witch hunt by HMRC leave a lot of questions on the table. Sadly enough, we not only have no decent investigative journalist out there to check this in minute detail, but also loads of people telling those who are even remotely suspicious to let go of their paranoia. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,253 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 Personally I don't mate. I believe an organised group were out to harm us but of course I have no proof. That's just my guess. IMO the whole thing was co-ordinated from LBG(as I've already mentioned) & HMRC standing back & allowing Whyte to acquire Rangers (despite the fact he already owed them millions) then proceding to allow him to run up millions in unpaid PAYE/NI. Oh and not to mention an EBT tax bill starting at £24m to which HMRC werent entitled to either at which they've failed twice at their own internal appeals processes (FTTT & UTTT). Call me a cynic but I fully believe this was all being orchestrated by a small group of individuals with the aim of causing maximum financial damage to Rangers as SDM abandoned ship. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 IMO the whole thing was co-ordinated from LBG(as I've already mentioned) & HMRC standing back & allowing Whyte to acquire Rangers (despite the fact he already owed them millions) then proceding to allow him to run up millions in unpaid PAYE/NI. Oh and not to mention an EBT tax bill starting at £24m to which HMRC werent entitled to either at which they've failed twice at their own internal appeals processes (FTTT & UTTT). Call me a cynic but I fully believe this was all being orchestrated by a small group of individuals with the aim of causing maximum financial damage to Rangers as SDM abandoned ship. As you always ask for them from others, Rab, it's only fair that you provide us with the names and some evidence to back up those claims, yes? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,253 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 As you always ask for them from others, Rab, it's only fair that you provide us with the names and some evidence to back up those claims, yes? The names of those alleged to have been behind all of this before and after whtye got Rangers are well known.Dont you think something was going on? Too much coincidence for my liking. And the names of the individuals allegedly involved doest surprise me.Well known Rangers haters 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 26, 2014 Share Posted September 26, 2014 The names of those alleged to have been behind all of this before and after whtye got Rangers are well known.Dont you think something was going on? Too much coincidence for my liking. And the names of the individuals allegedly involved doest surprise me.Well known Rangers haters They may be well known to you, Rab, but what about those of us who don't have the finger on the pulse? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 They may be well known to you, Rab, but what about those of us who don't have the finger on the pulse? He means Manus Fullerton and he is 100% wrong. That individual did not run LBG's Scottish Business Division and would have had no legitimate influence in any decisions relating to Rangers / SDM. That is a fact. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,219 Posted September 27, 2014 Share Posted September 27, 2014 He means Manus Fullerton and he is 100% wrong. That individual did not run LBG's Scottish Business Division and would have had no legitimate influence in any decisions relating to Rangers / SDM. That is a fact. It is sure not about legitimate influences here. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.