Juancornetto 1 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Strange, the Statement on the BBC Scotland page has missed out the Irvine and Journalists with no integrity part. The BBC doth protest too much. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 I haven't read all the replied to DK's statement but one thing stands out for me. Ashley is a cancer in the club that needs removed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 (edited) Strange, the Statement on the BBC Scotland page has missed out the Irvine and Journalists with no integrity part. Not strange at all al Lamont and scrote are the two worst culprits Edited October 24, 2014 by the gunslinger 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Strange, the Statement on the BBC Scotland page has missed out the Irvine and Journalists with no integrity part. Whoever filed that piece (no byline submitted) is 'on the defensive' because he knows himself to be 'guilty' and/or is editing after Toxic influence. Such a statement shouldn't have had any omissions or at least been made available in full via an easily visible link. The omission only leads one to help confirm that certain individuals within BBC Scotland (IMO, McLaughlin and Lamont) were jounalists included in the DK reference to the Toxic conduit. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,231 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 You would need someone who had the trust of all the Support, not an easy task as we have seen. The only man I have seen these last few years that has "no pedigree" one way or another is Letham. That said, I know next to nothing about him either, but him in the King-camp and willing to change the club for the better is sure a good start for most. While it may be a strange idea for many, you do wonder hwy, in times like these, certain people have not (openly, at least) tried to talk to SDM and ask him to atone (somewhat) for sins of the past by getting us our club back. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,145 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Until we see the accounts and the manner in what the AGM is constituted (i.e. resolutions offered to shareholders) then there's not much to add really. I can only assume King would know the outcome of this dialogue so will have a course of action in mind to address what was always going to be an obvious block in the road. We'll probably have to wait another 4-6 weeks before we're perhaps given more information on where we go from here. The joy! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,231 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 In this day and age, you would expect Murray and Letham to be able to conduct further discussions with Easdale and Co. by themselves, without a personal appearance from King. They can phone him up in no time if need be. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Money is the only solution, we either put up or shut up. Moans, groans and protests are pointless. Is it not worth giving these animals what they want to get our club back? Can't the Rangers family gather together as one consortium and pay the £30/40m to get our club back. Say King pays £10m, Park £5m, SDM £5m, Lewis £5m, Letham and Murray and other supporting millionaires put up £500k each and then the average fan on the street gives what they can through official channels and we all gather together as one to get our club back. One group, one team, one family, not 2, not 3, not 4. One. Money is the only solution here, forget protests and card displays, get the money out and let's play. It's time for the Rangers family to pay up. No more talking, ask them what they want and raise it as soon as we can. lawls 40m for a basket case disaster heading for admin 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 lawls 40m for a basket case disaster heading for admin How much do you think they would want to walk away? If any such takeover was doene right we wouldn't be heading for admin at all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 You would need someone who had the trust of all the Support, not an easy task as we have seen. Most of the money would come from a group of maybe 8 to 10 individuals, i am sure if we had them together with a genuine plan the rest would follow. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.