Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

After 3pm apparently for those on Sky Go or in the house!

 

He's going to be explaining the Ashley loans... :whistle:

 

Comments:

 

- David Somers claims Dave King consortium investment offer was breaching regulatory requirements so rejected them at 'Stage One'.

 

- Somers claims 8 people were in King consortium but SA businessman refused to provide names and proof of funds.

 

- Somers said that King was prepared to offer up 3 names before giving the rest if agreement made in principle.

 

- Stage Two represented comparing Ashley and Kennedy bids whereby former was approved due to better deal on interest and security

 

- Somers also claims Rangers make a lot of money from existing retail deal with Mike Ashley.

Edited by Frankie
Link to post
Share on other sites

would be nice if he was as concerned about naming all the previous investors BPH springs to mind.... apparently King is responding later. cant help but think he has to lay everything on the table in terms of the deal he proposed. if he isn't straight up then it leaves doubts as to whether he actually proposed a deal that could be accepted..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what security Kennedy wanted?

 

Did Kennedy really want interest back on his loan?

 

Why couldn't King provide proof of funds?

 

Why did King refuse to name 5 members of his consortium?

 

I thought we earned nothing from merchandising? Somers claims we do, a lot according to him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what security Kennedy wanted?

 

Did Kennedy really want interest back on his loan?

 

Why couldn't King provide proof of funds?

 

Why did King refuse to name 5 members of his consortium?

 

I thought we earned nothing from merchandising? Somers claims we do, a lot according to him.

 

That'll be the same Somers who told the AGM that he couldn't remember who appointed him.

 

The same Somers who stated we should be grateful for Brian Stockbridge.

 

The same Somers who claimed the fans protested against apartheid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what security Kennedy wanted?

 

Did Kennedy really want interest back on his loan?

 

Why couldn't King provide proof of funds?

 

Why did King refuse to name 5 members of his consortium?

 

I thought we earned nothing from merchandising? Somers claims we do, a lot according to him.

 

Why do we need a loan from Ashley then? Somers talks nonsense imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a listed company, how the hell are this lot allowed to get away with these lies ?? This guy is obvioulsy put forward as the puppet to spout nonsense on behalf of his employers.

 

Do AIM and the regulators not monitor the pish and activities that comes from these chancers ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.