Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

It's all very well King calling for this, that and the other but in real terms such boycotts cause the club harm and results in the loss of jobs like we've heard about overnight.

 

Despite the valid concerns King has, for many fans it will be too difficult to do. With that in mind, I'd like to see a more positive strategy from him but given we've not seen this previously, I won't be holding my breath now.

 

you mean like offering 16 million in investment.

 

or 50 million.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean like offering 16 million in investment.

 

or 50 million.....

 

All well and good but without a clear plan and ways of getting more fans onside, it's easily dismissed by the people he has to pressurise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All well and good but without a clear plan and ways of getting more fans onside, it's easily dismissed by the people he has to pressurise.

 

With no clear plan, no proof of funds, not naming investors etc DK played right into the hands of the board.

He gave them perfect reason to reject his proposals whatever they were.

If he'd been up front things would have been different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All well and good but without a clear plan and ways of getting more fans onside, it's easily dismissed by the people he has to pressurise.

 

how do you positively pressurize this lot.

 

you can't.

 

we have to force them and it won't be pretty. revolution never is.

 

or we can continue like just now because their is no middle ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With no clear plan, no proof of funds, not naming investors etc DK played right into the hands of the board.

He gave them perfect reason to reject his proposals whatever they were.

If he'd been up front things would have been different.

 

don't be ridiculous only the excuses would change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With no clear plan, no proof of funds, not naming investors etc DK played right into the hands of the board.

He gave them perfect reason to reject his proposals whatever they were.

If he'd been up front things would have been different.[/quote

 

The minute he names names Toxic would have begun his usual hatchet job............remember all the abuse McColl got, last year?

Link to post
Share on other sites

how do you positively pressurize this lot.

 

you can't.

 

we have to force them and it won't be pretty. revolution never is.

 

or we can continue like just now because their is no middle ground.

 

I'm not saying it has to be pretty but, as it stands, it's not working.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anyone ever find out what purpose McColl served, he made it clear he wouldn't invest and was also a Thistle fan, wouldn't it have been better if he and King had joined forces at least in a business sense.

 

mccoll has business restrictions with investors he can't invest in anything else just now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.