SteveC 150 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Me too SC, but they don't make any sense (the increase is the same thing, basically - it is not two increases, it is the one increase reported twice - I think) but they don't tie up with the rest of it in any case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Me too SC, but they don't make any sense (the increase is the same thing, basically - it is not two increases, it is the one increase reported twice - I think) but they don't tie up with the rest of it in any case. Yeah, it's well above my head. Like a foreign language. This is where we need guys like FS and BD to tell us what is what. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Boooooooooo: " CEO Craig Mather received £350K for his pay-off" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Some trough, some size of snouts, fecking Vampire pigs the lot of them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 I can't follow them at all, little makes sesne. Retail is up to 7million + (but then I guess we don't get to touch it - but what does that figure consist of anyway? If £3million plus was locked away at the end of June and the figures don't go far beyond that how is it £7.6million? Also why is Ashley's 3 million recent loan(s) in figures for the first half of the year? did we actually receive £7.6m from Rangers Retail? or is it still with Rangers Retail? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Looking forward to the thoughts of the accountants! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 We knew that. I expected worse. They just look far healthier than i thought they would. Can't believe turnover is over £25m. I predicted about £18m. We knew we were running at a loss, that isn't new info, it's not earth shattering or news, frankly even i thought we were running at a far higher loss. Again i guessed around £500k per month. I dont' see what else i am missing. I can't see the huge director salaries or money that the sp!vs/hedge funds were stealing, where does it show us this? Stunned by these figures quite frankly. At June 2014, £3,069,000 cash relating to Rangers Retail Limited "not immediately available as working capital. then we're taking 3m loans form ashley? really? Severance payments were made to directors in the year of £566,000 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 I suspect the devil will be in the detail. £8m just to survive and the board treat supporters with utter contempt. Makes sense! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 The full show people: http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=RFC&ArticleCode=rdhka4v4&ArticleHeadline=Final_Results 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted November 27, 2014 Share Posted November 27, 2014 Another Rangers accounts find: "...obligation of Rangers Retail Ltd to purchase stock at cost higher than resale value for season 2013/14." Just to reiterate that. Rangers paid £411,000 under obligation to buy stock through Rangers Retail Ltd at a cost higher than resale value. Bloody hell!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.