Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 We don't deserve anything after the way we treated him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Very good statement from Rangers for a change! Which Scottish authority has stated we are the same club? Gerry McCulloch, Jim Spence and Scotzine seem to disagree and claim no one in this country have claimed any such thing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Which Scottish authority has stated we are the same club? Gerry McCulloch, Jim Spence and Scotzine seem to disagree and claim no one in this country have claimed any such thing. the courts, the sfa, the spfl. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Now being reported that club statement is being watered down after DU denied using 2 year argument. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Lord Nimmo Smith/Glennie/SPL: http://tiny.cc/ojiipw - Extracts from NimmoSmith verdicts stating Rangers FC continues (JPG) http://tiny.cc/4fgn9w - Lord Nimmo Smith's FIRST report, clarifying Gers as same club (PDF) http://tiny.cc/fegn9w - Lord Nimmo Smith's SECOND concluding report, further emphasising Gers as same club (PDF) http://tiny.cc/xn6kqw - SPL CEO Neil Doncaster: "It is an existing club, even though it's a new company" 1 minute in. http://tiny.cc/0ko6xw - Lord Glennie - distinguishing between company and club UEFA: http://tiny.cc/ku8hdx - ASA describing UEFA position: "sporting continuity of club's match record" (JPG) http://tiny.cc/2o8hdx - UEFA's email: newcoing is "a change to a club's legal form" (JPG) http://tiny.cc/u8akpw - UEFA Rangers "Scottish Cup" squad (Elgin game) updated 8th Dec 2012 (LINK) http://tiny.cc/r12kqw - UEFA's updated Scottish Cup squad (JPG) SFL/SPFL: http://tiny.cc/8h832w - SPFL Rangers home page - "Founded 1872" - Full trophy list (LINK) http://tiny.cc/pyyzyw - Derek Longmuir, SFL CEO, congratulating Gers on 140 years. SFA: http://tiny.cc/otgn9w - Tom English ECA article stating "The SFA’s response was unambiguous. Different corporate entity but same Rangers" http://tiny.cc/xn832w - SFA statement - Newco are "the new owners of the Rangers Football Club" http://tiny.cc/b1kuyw - SFA 2013 Annual Review - RFC "entering liquidation and subsequently accommodated into SFL3" http://tiny.cc/qdfjqw - SFA's Scottish Cup archive: Rangers FC record continuous into 2013. (JPG) http://tiny.cc/gt3kqw - SFA Q&A: clarifying status of "Rangers FC" re. Div 3, 4 yrs of accounts, Scottish Cup entry (LINK) http://tiny.cc/lu3kqw - SFA statement "full membership has been transferred". (LINK) HMRC: http://tiny.cc/cryzyw - "the liquidation route does not prejudice the proposed sale of the club. This sale [of Rangers FC] can take place either through a CVA or a liquidation." (LINK) European Clubs Association: http://tiny.cc/yw5kqw - "The organisation considers the club?s history to be continuous regardless of the change of company" (LINK) Advertising Standards Authority: http://tiny.cc/r3fn9w - Rangers' most successful club claim is rubber-stamped by the ASA (updated with UEFA clarification) BBC - Independent report by Editorial Standards Committee: http://tiny.cc/lezzyw - "where.. the BBC had made the distinction between an ?old? and ?new? Rangers.. club as opposed to the ?old? and ?new? company, ..due accuracy had not been achieved." Malcolm Cohen - BDO Liquidator: http://tiny.cc/z0u72w - "appointment of liquidators... only the end of the company that ran the club." Neil Patey - Partner at Ernst and Young: http://tiny.cc/x8u72w - "a newco in legal terms, but the club is a continution". http://tiny.cc/0cv72w - Q & A with BBC, many quotes such as Green "bought the club", new owners etc. Proof of post-liquidation survival precedents: http://tiny.cc/5jnqqw - Leeds were liquidated/No CVA - KPMG source http://www.mightyleeds.co.uk/pdf/sea...kpmgletter.pdf - Comprehensive account of Leeds liquidation/CVA failure http://tiny.cc/7tpqqw - Arbitration case proving Leeds no CVA http://www.theifo.co.uk/adjudication...llettfinal.pdf - Luton = No CVA (Same as Bournemouth/Rotherham/Leeds) http://judgmental.org.uk/judgments/E...A_Civ_180.html Crystal Palace were also liquidated. http://tiny.cc/9xp6xw (PDF) and http://tiny.cc/8cq6xw (JPG) - Portsmouth were also "liquidated" in 2010 Hearts founded 1874? Oldco liquidated/newco formed in 1905. http://i.cubeupload.com/A4vVCx.jpg - Hearts old company wound up in 1905, newco formed (from official website history!) http://i.cubeupload.com/P9Cxoa.jpg - Liquidator of Hearts old company detailed in Edinburgh Gazette And finally....Dermot Desmond: http://tiny.cc/vqo6xw - "A fantastic club with great history" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 (edited) Statement 1 from Rangers RANGERS has received today the decision of the SPFL Compensation Tribunal and are content with the fee Dundee United have been ordered to pay for the training and development of Charlie Telfer who was at the Club for a period of 10 years. The payment awarded, which was significantly higher than Dundee United’s final offer, vindicates the Club’s decision to take the matter to a Compensation Tribunal. Dundee United introduced a late argument stating Rangers should only be awarded compensation for the training and development of Charlie Telfer for 2 years instead of the 10 years that he was with the Club. They argued the Club in its current form has only existed for two years. It is disappointing Dundee United tried to pursue this tiresome, legally incorrect and provocative argument given that it has been repeatedly confirmed by the football authorities in Scotland and beyond that administration and liquidation of the companies that owned the Club did not break the continuity of the Club’s history or its record of honours won. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dundee Utd publicly say they didn't use new club argument ------------------------------------------------------------------ Rangers revise statement RANGERS has received today the decision of the SPFL Compensation Tribunal and are content with the fee Dundee United have been ordered to pay for the training and development of Charlie Telfer who was at the Club for a period of 10 years. The payment awarded, which was significantly higher than Dundee United’s final offer, vindicates the Club’s decision to take the matter to a Compensation Tribunal. http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/8235-club-statement -------------------------------- Almost reminds me of Charles Green trying to play the siege mentality card. Daniel Stewart used to f**k up their announcements and have to correct them through incompetence. In this case, it seems as though someone is lying. Edited December 9, 2014 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Different class Gunslinger. Cheers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Statement 1 from Rangers RANGERS has received today the decision of the SPFL Compensation Tribunal and are content with the fee Dundee United have been ordered to pay for the training and development of Charlie Telfer who was at the Club for a period of 10 years. The payment awarded, which was significantly higher than Dundee United’s final offer, vindicates the Club’s decision to take the matter to a Compensation Tribunal. Dundee United introduced a late argument stating Rangers should only be awarded compensation for the training and development of Charlie Telfer for 2 years instead of the 10 years that he was with the Club. They argued the Club in its current form has only existed for two years. It is disappointing Dundee United tried to pursue this tiresome, legally incorrect and provocative argument given that it has been repeatedly confirmed by the football authorities in Scotland and beyond that administration and liquidation of the companies that owned the Club did not break the continuity of the Club’s history or its record of honours won. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dundee Utd publicly say they didn't use new club argument ------------------------------------------------------------------ Rangers revise statement RANGERS has received today the decision of the SPFL Compensation Tribunal and are content with the fee Dundee United have been ordered to pay for the training and development of Charlie Telfer who was at the Club for a period of 10 years. The payment awarded, which was significantly higher than Dundee United’s final offer, vindicates the Club’s decision to take the matter to a Compensation Tribunal. http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/8235-club-statement -------------------------------- Almost reminds me of Charles Green trying to play the siege mentality card. Have we changed our official statement? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 from twitter, Thompson has pulled this before ... http://www.thecourier.co.uk/sport/football/dundee-united/dundee-united-in-row-with-queen-s-park-over-youth-signings-compensation-1.94601 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Have we changed our official statement? Yes, as per post #47. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.