Jump to content

 

 

McMurdo's latest, not one positive thing to say about the 3 Bears!


Recommended Posts

]That is the most ridiculous thing McMurdo has ever written [/b]and that is saying something.

 

He has lost it entirely.

 

No it's not mate. The guy posts ridiculous propaganda on a regular basis.

 

I'm not even sure how much input he has to "his own blog". Bought and sold months ago.

 

He is a huge embarrassment and a disgrace to all Bears.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill has really set a few people on the back foot, after all what has changed except the names on share certs, Laxey via Kingsnorth have all but admitted they were powerless against Ashley, even with 16% shareholding. What will the new share holders be able to enforce against Ashley that the Laxey camp failed to.

 

There will be no share issue it will be a rights issue if any at all, the share issue was voted down by RF and RST amongst others.

When Ashley decides good or bad we will know.

 

Haven't seen good buddy RangersRab about, surely not another enforced holiday.

 

This is actually true and why it is utterly futile anyone putting their hand in their pocket to buy shares unless you gain 51% and can effect change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know or care to know anything about Toxic Jack, Merlin, McMurdo, Old Uncle Tom Cobley and all but Rangers are going to require more or less a new team at the end of this season whether we gain promotion or not. Regardless of whether we are in the SPFL next season that team will need to be upgraded gradually over the next two or three seasons at least until hopefully we start to feature regularly in Europe again and can become self-financing.

 

So it is a legitimate question to ask of Ashley, Los Tres Amigos, or any other individual or group of individuals seeking to gain control of the Club, exactly how much and by what means they intend funding the re-establishment of the Club from it's current hand to mouth existence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually true and why it is utterly futile anyone putting their hand in their pocket to buy shares unless you gain 51% and can effect change.

 

I note that Mr Houston of SoS concurs with your reservations (you should read his contribution very well thought out), always good to see some approach from the angle of truth rather than wishful thinking, there would be less beeling people in the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note that Mr Houston of SoS concurs with your reservations (you should read his contribution very well thought out), always good to see some approach from the angle of truth rather than wishful thinking, there would be less beeling people in the world

Frankie asked you this question not so long ago, but for some reason best known to you, you failed to answer.

 

I might try again, if I might be so bold, now here's what Frankie said to you -

 

Quattro or whatever alias he's using this week on knows this full well. Before I ban him again, maybe he can explain why he continues to hide behind a variety of logins and proxies across the community and does what he does? Because I certainly can't begin to understand him and I doubt David Holmes could either...

 

 

Any chance of answering this time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually true and why it is utterly futile anyone putting their hand in their pocket to buy shares unless you gain 51% and can effect change.

 

How do they need to get 51 percent themselves? Them and other shareholders who back them may soon have more than Ashley, the Easdales and the Easdale proxies. Its a case of doing the arithmetic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bill has really set a few people on the back foot, after all what has changed except the names on share certs, Laxey via Kingsnorth have all but admitted they were powerless against Ashley, even with 16% shareholding. What will the new share holders be able to enforce against Ashley that the Laxey camp failed to.

 

There will be no share issue it will be a rights issue if any at all, the share issue was voted down by RF and RST amongst others.

When Ashley decides good or bad we will know.

 

Haven't seen good buddy RangersRab about, surely not another enforced holiday.

Really don't understand you lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.