Bluedell 5,329 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 How do we think Cazenove and L&G view things ?? Impossible to say, particularly as we don't know if they are holding the investments as part of their own portfolio or are holding it specifically for someone else. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 (edited) Impossible to say, particularly as we don't know if they are holding the investments as part of their own portfolio or are holding it specifically for someone else. I'm taking it that they are holding it as part of their own portfolio. It will be within their invstments funds, such as OEIC's or Investments Trusts - i.e. mutal funds/pooled funds, in the same way as R&M Assest management and Artemis would have. Edited January 7, 2015 by MoodyBlue 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 After all last weeks hullabaloo, I'd forgotten that Artemis still had a reasonable holding. I thought it was the Artemis & Miton shares which Dave King had purchased. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 I thought it was the Artemis & Miton shares which Dave King had purchased. yes - he did - but looks like Artemis have kept some of their holding ?? as this is showing them having a about 5% - unless I am gtting confused. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 I thought it was the Artemis & Miton shares which Dave King had purchased. That was reported at the time, but there has been nothing from the LSE to confirm it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Unless I am interpreting this totally wrong, Artemis held around 9% before selling around half of their shares to King, leaving them with about 4% now ?? Yes ?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 1,876 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 When I read Artemis I thought it was a mistake... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Looks like STV have aspects of their shareholder chart wrong because the 02 January Artemis trade appeared on the LSE today along with some other big ones from 02 January. Here's a screenshot and I've added an arrow to point out the Artemis trade. 8,109,223 was their full shareholding of 9.95%. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Thanks Zappa - was getting confused by some of the various lists of % holdings that are flying about and some are suggesting Artemis still holding around 4% - but this appears to clarify it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 that assumes that artemis only had their original shares? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.