trublusince1982 243 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 You know full well there's a protocol to follow.does that mean no concern regarding the rangers board and ashley has been put forward? is that since conception? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 does that mean no concern regarding the rangers board and ashley has been put forward? is that since conception? No it doesn't. It means there's a protocol in place so that the 12 RFB members don't issue 12 different statements. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 BH, you really do need to stop posting in a manner regarding RFB issues which makes you look like the little boy scorned. It isn't doing you any favors at all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 No it doesn't. It means there's a protocol in place so that the 12 RFB members don't issue 12 different statements. thanks for answer fs. think protocol might need refined 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 thanks for answer fs. think protocol might need refined Fair point . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 I agree with FS here. The RFB are all volunteers and as such they need a reasonable amount of time to confer as a group and issue a statement. I think it is unreasonable to expect them to be available 24/7. Maybe this function will have to be addressed to allow for a swifter reponse. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 You know full well there's a protocol to follow. One that you have already breached when it suited you to do so. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 (edited) Why don't you put these questions through the officIal channel . Fair point, will email the Secretary directly. Edited January 16, 2015 by BrahimHemdani 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 To think some wanted to restrict all communication with the club to the RFB. Can I correct that, hopefully for the last time. I wanted to restrict communication to elected groups, or to put it more precisely, I tabled a proposal first made on another forum, with which I agreed, that given the existence of the RFB, Rangers would no longer communicate with "unelected groups". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Did he actually state that? Anything I remember was worded in a way that can give them wriggle room. "We have no intention to...." was one example, from back in May, I believe. Oh aye, this isn't all about you. Well then they should ask why their intentions have changed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.