Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

the sfa can happily decide this either way. it may come down to the courts again for a proper judgement.

 

stopping p murray would simply be ridiculous. zero commonsense or out and out prejudice would have to be applied.

 

Surely if DK satisfies the AIM regs there would be nothing the SFA to prevent him sitting on the Rangers board?

PM is another matter altogether. The SFA may not wish him to return in case he started asking them awkward questions about Whyte's tenure

Edited by RANGERRAB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if DK satisfies the AIM regs there would be nothing the SFA to prevent him sitting on the Rangers board?

PM is another matter altogether. The SFA may not wish him to return in case he started asking them awkward questions about Whyte's tenure

 

the sfa need to stay within the law. that can't possibly include banning a guy who wasn't a director when whyte destroyed rangers and fought against him.

 

paul shakelton decides if dave king meets aim regs. think on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rangersitis is probably right. especially given it is the sfa and paul shakelton king must convince.

 

that said it is not cut and dry that he fails the criteria. as i point out the law in SA is a bit different. each case seems to have a £4,500 fine against it or 2 years in prison. that's not exactly commensurate. it's clearly a system designed to get the cash in quick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rab used to say the same thing about king not being allowed a role.

 

in truth it doesn't matter he can just go on the club board and run us from there.

 

or he will have friends to run us like mike ashley.

 

whole thing is a red herring.

 

Seems to work for Sandy Easdale...

Link to post
Share on other sites

the sfa need to stay within the law. that can't possibly include banning a guy who wasn't a director when whyte destroyed rangers and fought against him.

 

paul shakelton decides if dave king meets aim regs. think on that.

 

The SFA have their own rules some of which wouldn't stand up in a court of law as McBride QC once infamously stated

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SFA have their own rules some of which wouldn't stand up in a court of law as McBride QC once infamously stated

 

indeed. though as we proved they have to adhere to their own regs fairly.

 

on your first point about the aim and king i don't imagine he has been anywhere near the aim but maybe.

 

the truth is 4 off and john gilligan on will suffice..

Link to post
Share on other sites

indeed. though as we proved they have to adhere to their own regs fairly.

 

on your first point about the aim and king i don't imagine he has been anywhere near the aim but maybe.

 

the truth is 4 off and john gilligan on will suffice..

 

The truth is DK doesn't need to sit on the Rangers board to have control. He would simply appoint others such as GIlligan ,PM and others to carry out whatever he wanted done.The SFA couldn't do anything about that.

Farmer does something like that at HIVS does he not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.