Siam69 0 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 I haven't a clue who these people are...haven't been on much for a while I know but are they new nicknames for board people or bloggers? It's the same person who incessantly peddled that King could not move 10p out of S.Africa due to SARS, and look how that turned out. A proven liar and shitstirrer trying to create division between Bears. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 (edited) The same person who advises Merlin on his narrative and has Chris McLaughlin (BBC Scotland) on speed dial. Edited January 19, 2015 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 Did you expect them too? No, not at all. There have been far too many premature victory celebrations these past few years to think that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 If valid, the Board intends to seek to have such Notice withdrawn in order to avoid the cost and disruption of an ad hoc general meeting. Hopefully the board will realise that the easiest way to have the notice withdrawn is to abide by the proposed resolution. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 The current Rangers board were always going to stall on any EGM requisition no matter whether it came from Dave King or the Three Bears. Despite their official and public claims to the contrary, it seems very clear that the Rangers directors are completely biased towards & subservient to Mike Ashley. Dave King, the Three Bears and other like-minded parties are going to have to buy up even more shares, get total control and take the Club back by force. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,246 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 what's the chances of the board offering T3B board positions in exchange for not supporting the EGM ? A case of divide & rule ? T3B seem to be rather quiet don't they? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 what's the chances of the board offering T3B board positions in exchange for not supporting the EGM ?A case of divide & rule ? T3B seem to be rather quiet don't they? Why would the 3B's support this Board? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 what's the chances of the board offering T3B board positions in exchange for not supporting the EGM ?A case of divide & rule ? T3B seem to be rather quiet don't they? Not a chance in hell that T3B would accept that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 (edited) the best bet in my opinion would be for the 3 bears and king to approach the easdales and offer to leave them on the board if they agree to use their proxy to vote out the ashley affiliates. divide and conquer. Edited January 19, 2015 by trublusince1982 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 the best bet in my opinion would be for the 3 bears and king to approach the easdales and offer to leave them on the board if they agree to use their proxy to vote out the ashley affiliates. divide and conquer. You seriously think they would trust a word that comes out of any of the Easdales mouths? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.