BEARGER 1,829 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) I can assure you once again I wasn't hand picked and tbh I don't think anyone else was either. I think AH was proof of that! The candidates were hand picked were they not? In all my critisisms of RFB you are exempt, I know why you stood for selection/election. Edited January 31, 2015 by BEARGER 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) I did think it odd that we had got this close to kick off and the board hadn't done something to reduce the morale of fans. Edited January 31, 2015 by andy steel 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 board meet a few compliant pets to spread some propeganda. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 Quite apart from the issues of who did and didn't attend, there are many holes in what makes up what was discussed at the meeting. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 It would be interesting if it turned out that at least two of the three (Tom Clements, Alison Clark-Dick, and William Findlay) who attended this meeting didn't vote for the motion/vote of no confidence in the current Rangers Board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 31, 2015 Author Share Posted January 31, 2015 It would be interesting if it turned out that at least two of the three (Tom Clements, Alison Clark-Dick, and William Findlay) who attended this meeting didn't vote for the motion/vote of no confidence in the current Rangers Board. I don't think that's the case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 I don't think that's the case. Ok, so that's one layer of tinfoil which can come off my head. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 (edited) I find it quite hilarious anyone actually sitting listening to Ashley's 2 lackeys pretending that other forms of finance were genuinely considered. It's like a scene out of Curb Your Enthusiasm. FS the pro board sheep like ACD should not be discussing anything you are not invited to. You should demand they resign or resign yourself out of protest. This is just a sham and it will drag you down. Ps - why is the idea of revoking the vote of no confidence even being entertained? What has improved? Edited January 31, 2015 by Ser Barristan Selmy 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 They should not have attended without the others, or at least made an attempt to discuss it with them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted January 31, 2015 Share Posted January 31, 2015 I find it quite hilarious anyone actually sitting listening to Ashley's 2 lackies pretending that other forms of finance were genuinely considered. It's like a scene out of Curb Your Enthusiasm. FS the pro board sheep like ACD should not be discussing anything you are not invited to. You should demand they resign or resign yourself out of protest. This is just a sham and it will drag you down. That is what they are after, but then it leaves a vulnerable section of the support with no voice. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.