Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Yep, as BlueSolace says...we play our football in Scotland, not in one of the rich football nations. We are only an excellent manager and ridding ourselves of the Ashley camp away from returning to the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It still means King will have to raise a few million this month to keep Rangers afloat if he hopefully can reject Ashley's loan, then who knows how much more to put the club on a sound financial basis.

 

We all knew this to be the case anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a damning indictment of our modern allegedly regulated market that people can behave in such a selfish unscrupulous manner. More so when it comes to a massive football institution such as ourselves that has lurched from crisis to crisi over the last 4 years all at the hands of so-called captains of Industry ...(one honoured with a knighthood)...

 

And yet despite this leadership, vast salaries business experience, and AIM listing were we to approach banks for funding we would be refused. Corporate Goverance / AIM listing / Institutional Investors .....dont make me laugh

 

People become politicised through struggle. I hope what's happened to us has opened eyes to the vagaries of capitalism and we'll no longer be associated with the myth that The People are stuck in right wing support for the establishment

I don't want Dave King or anyone else to "pour £millions into our club" It's just not sustainable. I want the club to be run without debt and us spending what our revenue allows.

we can play good football with what we've got if we have decent managers and on a much tighter budget. Aberdeen, Dundee Utd. and Hearts can do it. Why can't we ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of this will be a huge surprise to King even if (most) fans will be disgusted (again) by the actions of the incumbents.

 

Like others, I suspect this is just another card being played to secure a pay off so we'll see if King finds this palatable enough to clear the decks ahead of his crowning on Friday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In an ideal scenario - should King and the 3Bs agree to that - we could check out Sarver's investment plan again and use his money to pay back SD & Co. immediately. That said, it would require more detailed info about how much money of the 10m has actually been used by the board* and how much can be returned immediately.

 

I would reckon that if there is another share issue or Sarver is giving the company a long term loan etc. more directors can be brought onto the board and thus sway any vote in favour of the good guys. Speaking of that, I canot see how King or Murray can work along with Llambias or Leach, nor that the latter two can keep their jobs.

 

Well, at the end of the day, one has to assume that King and the 3Bs have evaluated all possible scenarios and have a few alternative plans at the ready. We'll know soon enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone who has no business experience at all could King & Co not just set up a new company to handle our retail operation rather than RRL and SD?

 

I think there has been some chat about that but you'd imagine the existing contract will be written in such a way to plug such an outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.