WATP_Greg 0 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 for gods sake give him his money back and buy his blinking shares and hope we never hear of him again Then he'd still have us in the grip of an un-advantageous retail deal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 (edited) Then he'd still have us in the grip of an un-advantageous retail deal. I think you mean disadvantageous, Greg; but can you explain why paying back the loan does not release the securities? The retail deal is another matter, I don't see why he would renegotiate that, even if the loan was repaid, what would be the incentive for him to do that? And as I said I don't understand the need for these resolutions, surely the directors are so empowered by virtue of their office? Edited May 27, 2015 by BrahimHemdani typo 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Tear up the SD contract and get green in a Court Room. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Tear up the SD contract and get green in a Court Room. Under what charges? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 Under what charges? The terms of negotiation were illegal and breached fiduciary duty. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 The terms of negotiation were illegal and breached fiduciary duty. And that would stand up in a court of law would it ???? How do you know they were illegal? Can you prove breached fiduciary duty? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 And that would stand up in a court of law would it ???? How do you know they were illegal? Can you prove breached fiduciary duty? That is why i say tear it up and we'll have it out in court with SD. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 keith jackson @tedermeatballs 44m44 minutes ago Big Yorkshire hands and the seven year rolling retail contract... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 (edited) That is why i say tear it up and we'll have it out in court with SD. Like it or not my guess is the SD contracts will be watertight. If it were as simple as you seem to suggest I'd think KIng,Murray etc would have done this by now. My biggest fear is provoking Ashley will only lead to one outcome. Edited May 26, 2015 by RANGERRAB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted May 26, 2015 Share Posted May 26, 2015 keith jackson @tedermeatballs 44m44 minutes agoBig Yorkshire hands and the seven year rolling retail contract... King said that Ashley's threat measured in one to one hundred didn't amount to one. Doesn't look like it does it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.