Zappa 0 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 I'd actually be a bit pissed off if we spent anything over £350-400k on Scott Allan because we played against Hibs 7 times last season and while he's obviously a decent player, the lad didn't look like he was worth any more than that. I'd be happy enough if we signed him, but not for silly money. If someone wants to buy him for silly money, then good luck to them, but it shouldn't be us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,252 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Hibz seem to want a lot of money for a player who isn't an internationalist, hasn't really played in the top division of Scottish football & hasn't managed 100 first team games yet despite being nearly 24 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted July 23, 2015 Author Share Posted July 23, 2015 I'd actually be a bit pissed off if we spent anything over £350-400k on Scott Allan because we played against Hibs 7 times last season and while he's obviously a decent player, the lad didn't look like he was worth any more than that. I'd be happy enough if we signed him, but not for silly money. If someone wants to buy him for silly money, then good luck to them, but it shouldn't be us. Our support talked up Allan's ability, we virtually set the price for him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,213 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Over FF someone noted that over on a Hibs board it has been suggested that we have upped our bid to 350k. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefanovitch 0 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Over FF someone noted that over on a Hibs board it has been suggested that we have upped our bid to 350k. If it's true, which I doubt, we've doubled our initial offer BUT it still won't be enough 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,213 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 If it's true, which I doubt, we've doubled our initial offer BUT it still won't be enough As pointed out above (more credible sources than the DR), our initial offer was 250k, as opposed to some quoted figures. IMHO, 400 to 500k is the maximum. Maybe we can offer them a healthy sell-on clause. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chibmark 15 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Would love to see Scott Allan in a rangers jersey but to pay £500,000 + for him would be folly. He's in the final year of his contract and plays in the 2nd tier of Scottish football, reality is he should be worth £200,000 tops. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,252 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Would love to see Scott Allan in a rangers jersey but to pay £500,000 + for him would be folly. He's in the final year of his contract and plays in the 2nd tier of Scottish football, reality is he should be worth £200,000 tops. three years ago we paid circa £800k for Templeton !!!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
neutralscot 0 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Ach just ignore me. It's soul destroying losing every player that's any good. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 Waste of money, we have too many players like him we need goal scorers. He will be an improvement on Templeton and McKay but not £400k+ worth. Would rather gamble on the boy Harper before he signs for Brighton. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.