Spiers and The Herald have a slice of humble pie.

[Frankie 8,136]

I agree Frankie, it's a statement of the fact's, if any one wishes to contest it there are procedures in law to challenge it. Unlike Spiers i'm sure the RST could produce the evidence to back up their claims. Besides who nick picks and splits hairs about a statement from our own supporters group? Erm some on here it would seem. The vast majority of the support over the Rangers social media forums agree with it wholeheartedly, the evidence is there to back up that statement just go on the forums and see for yourselves, yes there are some hand-wringers moaning, but you get them everywhere.

 

To be fair, I don't think Pete is a hand-wringer and he's right to expect the Trust to avoid any hypocrisy. In this case I disagree with his worries though...

[Frankie 8,136]

Let's avoid the name-calling please folks.

[aweebluesoandso 290]

Let's avoid the name-calling please folks.

 

I wasn't referring to Pete and BH in particular about hand wringing more nitpickers, surely a reduced sentence for a minor offence?

Edited February 1, 2016 by aweebluesoandso

[pete 2,494]

Let's avoid the name-calling please folks.

 

Apologies but I dimmed it down already. If I was not a moderator I would probably be banned with what I had in mind. I just can't get round these stupid statements that if somebody dares to disagree with the main line they are hand-wringers or knuckle-dragers or whatever. I guess these people think they are some sort of uber-supporter that can put other supporters in categories.

Anyway going to fit some more tiles and calm down.