gisabeer 409 Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 hehehe. were better than them! id rather have smith bla bla bla!!!!! best part of the game was keeping the ball of them at the end. an absolute rout! dont think walter needed to motivate the team after that dickhead aberdeen player ranted in the rags! Ps walter you should have picked the team you had on today on wednesday. youd probably still be in the UEFA cup mate. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 Ps walter you should have picked the team you had on today on wednesday. youd probably still be in the UEFA cup mate. No we wouldn't - we would have been thrown out for fielding an ineligible player (BF). I know what you are saying thought, the formation today was the formation we need to have all the time... 4-4-2 is still the way to go (though I, like Gribz, like the 3-5-2) but you HAVE to have 2 players up front if you are going to use Boyd. I think with the formation that was put out today we would definitely have had a better chance of going through. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gisabeer 409 Posted March 17, 2007 Author Share Posted March 17, 2007 hi there smartypants. If wed have gone with the 4 4 2 formation wed have been in with a right chance with boyd and prso up front. too late for post mortems though. that was supposedly the toughest game of the season outside the old firm. easy ride from here on in if it was. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wija 0 Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 Apart from the fact Bazza was suspended he couldn't pick the same team...... :admin: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 I should have included the wink smiley gisa ! Have to say that the piss taking was awesome, even seeing wee flicks from Hutton, Papac beating the striker with a shimmy. They were chasing shadows during that piece of play ! I agree, a 4-4-2 would have given us a better chance in the UEFA ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whosthedado 1,481 Posted March 17, 2007 Share Posted March 17, 2007 I still don't think we would have made it through, but I agree 4-4-2 would have given us a far better chance. Far better today 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,494 Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 No we wouldn't - we would have been thrown out for fielding an ineligible player (BF). I know what you are saying thought, the formation today was the formation we need to have all the time... 4-4-2 is still the way to go (though I, like Gribz, like the 3-5-2) but you HAVE to have 2 players up front if you are going to use Boyd. I think with the formation that was put out today we would definitely have had a better chance of going through. Originally Posted by gisabeer hi there smartypants. If wed have gone with the 4 4 2 formation wed have been in with a right chance with boyd and prso up front. too late for post mortems though. that was supposedly the toughest game of the season outside the old firm. easy ride from here on in if it was. Not so smart because it was 2 ineligible players Papac was in the team as well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 Not so smart because it was 2 ineligible players Papac was in the team as well. Smart-ass Pete ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,494 Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 Smart-ass Pete ! I know Craig accountants have difficulty counting to 2, that's why you never mentioned it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 I know Craig accountants have difficulty counting to 2, that's why you never mentioned it. I didn't have my calculator handy ! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.