RiverBear7 0 Posted August 9, 2017 Share Posted August 9, 2017 I mentioned earlier here that Spurs are one of my favourite English teams and White Hart Lane is one of the few non-Ibrox stadiums i've seen club football at. I understand why this happens, stadiums are status assets and money machines. I think in Britain is started when City got their new stadium. That acquisition attracted silly money investment and essentially won them the league. While I obviously want Spurs to do well, and this will help, but this stadium seems a bit soul-less to me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 The only thing thats a bit annoying was the mass hysteria about Spurs leaving White Hart Lane. The ground is being built on the same site so they should be promoting that. Obviously they want renaming rights going somewhere to bring in cash. But Spurs need to strengthen soon. They dont have a big enough squad to play League and CL matches at the moment. They arent far away. Will be a quality stadium by the looks of it though. London alone could / should be hosting a major tournament. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.