ian1964 10,409 Posted November 8, 2018 Author Share Posted November 8, 2018 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 1 hour ago, ian1964 said: To take flak away from Celtic's statement on Wednesday. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,409 Posted November 8, 2018 Author Share Posted November 8, 2018 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,234 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 It was probably more important to us to get Collum's explanation to have a handle in the predicted rules change. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 Fast Track Tribunal Update | Daniel Candeias, Rangers FC Thursday 8 November 2018 Fast Track Tribunal Update| Daniel Candeias, Rangers FC Player: Daniel Candeias, Rangers FC Match: St Mirren FC v Rangers FC Date: 3 November 2018 Competition: SPFL Premiership Offence: B1l Claim: Mistaken Identity Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Wednesday 7 November 2018 Outcome: Claim dismissed. Original sanction re-imposed. https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,234 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 So he was not mistaken to have done nothing wrong. IMHO, they just say "yellow cards can't be appealed" red tape bla bla 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, der Berliner said: So he was not mistaken to have done nothing wrong. IMHO, they just say "yellow cards can't be appealed" red tape bla bla The roolz are the roolz. We paid our money, appealed with little prospect of the card getting overturned, it didn't, we move on. What we have done is highlight the obsurdity of the decision that went against us, (probably worth 1K). I didn't see how mistaken ID would work and tbh, I doubt the club expected anything different. Had the St.Mirren defender (AF) not been booked then maybe but he was booked aswell. Edited November 8, 2018 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
onevision 1,441 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 Has Collum explained why he issued Daniel a second yellow? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 1,876 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 Well hell mend the SFA and their nonsense disciplinary / appeals processes. I hope the club lawyers up and takes them to task. Its maybe not the most important issue in the world, but we are down a first team player for the weekend for a ridiculous decision, so fuck them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffer 1,665 Posted November 8, 2018 Share Posted November 8, 2018 10 minutes ago, buster. said: The roolz are the roolz. We paid our money, appealed with little prospect of the card getting overturned, it didn't, we move on. What we have done is highlight the obsurdity of the decision that went against us, (probably worth 1K). I didn't see how mistaken ID would work and tbh, I doubt the club expected anything different. Had the St.Mirren defender (AF) not been booked then maybe but he was booked aswell. I agree, this wasn't really about having the decision overturned, it was more about exposing it. However, now that it has been exposed, what will be done? Nothing! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.