Jump to content

 

 

Ultra-processed food: is it killing you?


Recommended Posts

You knew that cheeky packet of crisps or chocolate bar at 3pm every day wasn't great for your health – but did you know to what degree? A new study has laid bare the dangers of consuming 'ultra-processed' food – a category that contains white bread, ready meals, sausages, sugary cereals, fizzy drinks, and crisps. Researchers at Paris-Sorbonne University tracked the diets and subsequent mortality of nearly 45,000 middle-aged French participants. They found that every 10 per cent increase in intake of “ultra-processed food” was linked to a 14 per cent increased risk of death within the next eight years. Worrying? If you look at the statistics around our food consumption, it should be. According to a separate study from 2018, 'ultra-processed' foods make up around 50pc of British diets. The term “ultra-processed foods” is a relatively new one, coined by Brazilian nutrition researcher Carlos Monteiro, creator of NOVA, a food classification system that ranks foods on just how processed they are. NOVA has become widely used in recent years, helping to clear up the confusion caused by the fact that, previously, “processed” meant different things to different people. For example, some would consider freezing and canning food to be processing it, while for others processing meant adding certain chemicals. NOVA divides food into four groups: Unprocessed or minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed foods, and ultra-processed foods. So, which is which, and how can you tell them apart?

 

Group One – Unprocessed or minimally processed foods

This is a two-in-one category, but, in short, it’s probably not worth you worrying about these foods too much. Unprocessed foods are defined as “edible parts of plants (seeds, fruits, leaves, stems, roots) or of animals (muscle, offal, eggs, milk), and also fungi, algae and water”, that you can eat without doing anything to them. Minimally processed foods are those which have had some small cosmetic things done to them such as removal of inedible or unwanted parts. Freezing, boiling, canning, vacuum-packing, and pasteurisation are also considered minimal processing. Crucially, food and drink can only be considered unprocessed or minimally processed if it has not had additives put into it. One small caveat is additives used to preserve the properties of the original food, such as vacuum-packed vegetables with added anti-oxidants.

 

Group Two – Processed culinary ingredients

Next up we’ve got ingredients that are made by processing Group One foods or obtained directly from nature. For example, salt mined from seawater or sugar made from sugarcane. Basically all stuff that is designed for cooking and seasoning other dishes. Again, they mostly won’t contain additives, except those used to preserve the properties of the original food.

 

Group Three – Processed foods

The easiest way to think of processed foods is that they’re made from added the two previous groups together. Think of something like salted fish, for example. Processed foods are generally made from two or three ingredients. Here the object of processing the food is “to increase the durability of group 1 foods, or to modify or enhance their sensory qualities.”

Additives are also added to processed foods to preserve their original qualities or prevent microbial infection.

 

Group Four - Ultra-processed foods

And finally we come to the food group which has been linked to higher mortality. These ones are the “industrial formulations” where ingredients from Group One are a very small proportion or even entirely absent. Think pre-made ready meals, powdered soups, biscuits, chocolate, and ice cream. You’ll find that ultra-processed food have many additives including sugar, salt, fat, oil, and preservatives. Ingredients are sometimes extracted from other foods or derived from processing processed foods even further. Ultra-processed foods are the only category where you’ll find dyes, colour-stabilisers, flavourings, non-sugar sweeteners, and emulsifiers. In addition, the processes used to make ultra-processed foods are ones which use machines and don’t have any traditional equivalent. NOVA also defines ultra-processed foods as those that are ready to eat, ready meals that only need to be heated. It also defines some of the market conditions of ultra-processed foods: “Common attributes of ultra-processed products are hyper-palatability, sophisticated and attractive packaging, multi-media and other aggressive marketing to children and adolescents, health claims, high profitability, and branding and ownership by transnational corporations.” Foods from Groups One and Three which have had “cosmetic or intensifying additives” put into them, such as yoghurt with artificial sweeteners, also count as ultra-processed foods.

 

How should you use the NOVA guide to eat healthily?

This guide to food processing was actually designed for a Brazilian food and nutrition guide which recommends ensuring that Group One foods form the basis of your diet, with small amounts of Group Two ingredients for taste. Group Three foods are ones that you should try to cut down on if you can and only eat as part of a meal with Group One and Two foods.

Finally, Group Four foods should be removed from your diet entirely. It may seem a challenge to take these classic (and delicious) foods out of your diet but if the results of this recent study are to be believed, doing so might help you live longer.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/nutrition/diet/identify-ultra-processed-foods/

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have an ageing population.  Better off if more of us start popping off a bit earlier.

 

I often try to eat more healthily but some days a £1 frozen lasagne just seems a lot easier than a fresh meal that costs about a fiver and causes loads of dishes.

 

Where does beer and whisky sit on the processed table?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Corporations will do what they can to cut down on regulation to earn more money and attain more power.

In the food industry, they don't give a Friar Tuck about the health or quality of life of Joe Punter.

 

Food chain is well fcuked up and they aim the corporate advertising campaigns/packaging at your children.

Also works well for Big Pharma's bottomline.

 

It's not rocket science,.......If you want to improve your quality of life, don't eat shite.

No diets or a month here or there, cut it out, period.

 

 

Edited by buster.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Scoff what you like, but not in huge quantities.

 

Go easy on the drink.

 

Do not smoke.

 

Walk or cycle as much as you can.

 

Get a couple of personal traners. Not the lycra clad dancing baboons but a dog and a horse. Don’t own the horse yourself. Cost a fortune. Help with somebody else’s.

 

Abjure funny substances.

 

Follow that advice and the Punter guy will be fine.

 

Oh and stop angsting  about plots and conspiracies and geezers turning a pound where they can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scott, everyone to their own.

People are welcome to consume and feed their children as much or as little shite as they want.

 

I happen to think the food chain is one of the major issues around that it can often have a big effect on the quality of life of individuals.

 

I stopped eating what the article calls 'ultra proccessed' and a lot of the other stuff mentioned a while back and I feel about 20 years younger. Got back to my weight level when in the Marines, shag more (better looking younger birds) and just feel so much better, ie. quality of life.

 

Corporations being corporations rather than plots & conspiracies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, buster. said:

shag more (better looking younger birds) and just feel so much better, ie. quality of life.

 

Ca’ canny with that too, my lad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎17‎/‎02‎/‎2019 at 05:00, buster. said:

Corporations will do what they can to cut down on regulation to earn more money and attain more power.

In the food industry, they don't give a Friar Tuck about the health or quality of life of Joe Punter.

 

Food chain is well fcuked up and they aim the corporate advertising campaigns/packaging at your children.

Also works well for Big Pharma's bottomline.

 

It's not rocket science,.......If you want to improve your quality of life, don't eat shite.

No diets or a month here or there, cut it out, period.

 

 

The food chain isn't fucked up.  People have choices, they choose poorly.  The main staple foods of a proper, balanced diet are still there, as they have been for centuries.  

 

You even state as much with your "if you want to improve the quality of life, don't eat shite".  All about choices.

 

You lay the blame of all ills at the feet of corporations.  The reality is actually that if people chose to eat healthier then the corporations you so despise would either die or change.  People make choices which allow corporations to generate outsized profits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.