Jump to content

 

 

Club1872 statement re Celtc game


Recommended Posts

 
Club 1872 meeting with Police Scotland

Dear Member,

Ahead of the upcoming Old Firm match on 31st March, Club 1872 representatives met with Police Scotland and Rangers to discuss security and safety arrangements for Rangers supporters attending the game.

Club 1872 communicated concerns over the requirement for Rangers supporters to enter the stadium prior to 11am. We also questioned the security arrangements for supporters leaving the stadium, following issues with Rangers supporters being attacked after exiting the game at Celtic Park earlier this season.

Regarding the early entry, it was made clear that this was a decision made on safety grounds and was something Celtic had insisted upon. Other options were put forward and discussed by Police Scotland, Rangers and Celtic but were ruled out on safety grounds. Whilst we appreciate the inconvenience this causes to our travelling supporters, safety does take precedence and there are no grounds to challenge the decision that are likely to be successful, following issues with overcrowding at Celtic Park earlier in the season.

Police Scotland have assured us that they have taken account of the problems Rangers supporters faced exiting Celtic Park following the Old Firm game there earlier this season and that alternative arrangements which are now in place should improve this.

We will be meeting with Police Scotland again following the game so if our supporters do face similar, or other issues, these will be raised at that time.

Club 1872

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noted that the Celtic commissioned independent consultancy into the crush has been done by Fairhurst Engineering. Seems to be a link to Bath Street Holdings and from there to Pacific Shelf. Who’d have thunk it?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairhurst_(company)

 

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/SC159839

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Walterbear
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Walterbear said:

I noted that the Celtic commissioned independent consultancy into the crush has been done by Fairhurst Engineering. Seems to be a link to Bath Street Holdings and from there to Pacific Shelf. Who’d have thunk it?

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairhurst_(company)

 

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/SC159839

 

 

There's no link to Celtic. Pacific Shelf companies are just off-the-shelf companies that anyone can purchase. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, barca72 said:

So, one should consider them separate entities then?

You do know what off the shelf companies are, right barca ?

 

Basically there will be a plethora of "Pacific Shelf" companies - what would tie Celtic to a Pacific Shelf company would be the number eg, Pacific Shelf 1872 (see what I did there ? :D) - it is the 1872 that would be how you would tie them to Celtic if it was Celtic that had incorporated a Company from that "Shelf" Company.

 

The Pacific Shelf companies, much like the sevco companies, are boilerplate companies with very generic Memo and Articles of Association - they cost little to incorporate and are done quickly and efficiently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.