Jump to content

 

 

Kezia Dugdale wins 'homophobic' defamation case brought by Wings Over Scotland blogger


Recommended Posts

The Wings Over Scotland blogger Stuart Campbell attempted to sue the former Scottish Labour leader after she branded his tweet homophobic.

Former Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale has won a legal action by a pro-independence blogger who accused her of defamation.

Wings Over Scotland activist Stuart Campbell took the MSP to court in Edinburgh last month over her newspaper claim he sent “homophobic tweets”.

But today Sheriff Nigel Ross ruled that although Dugdale’s accusation wasn’t correct her Daily Record column contained “the necessary elements for a defence of fair comment”.

Campbell strenuously denied being a homophobe and insisted such an allegation is both “untrue” and “unfair”.

He went to court to protect his reputation as someone who consistently supported the equal treatment of homosexual people, and also sought £25,000 damages.

Campbell sued Dugdale, 37, for defamation over a column she wrote in the Daily Record on March 7, 2017, referencing his “homophobic tweets”.

The tweet at the heart of the action, made during the Conservative Party conference on March 3 that year, stated: “Oliver Mundell is the sort of public speaker that makes you wish his dad had embraced his homosexuality sooner.”

Sheriff Ross said: “Mr Campbell intended the tweet to be insulting about Oliver Mundell’s speaking abilities, and the reference to his father’s homosexuality was intended as a basis for a jibe directed at the son.

“The jibe was to the effect that a homsexual man would not father children and therefore his son would never have been born and have become a public speaker.”

Campbell, 51, from Bath, Somerset, denied it was a homophobic reference to Scottish Secretary David Mundell being gay.

His QC Craig Sandison described it as “satirical criticism” of Scottish Conservative MSP Oliver Mundell’s public speaking skills.

Dugdale’s comment, he said, was “not fairly made” and claimed it was motivated in part by her “ill feeling” towards the blogger.

Roddy Dunlop QC, for Dugdale, described the Aberdeen-born Lothian MSP as “entirely credible and reliable”.

The true question was whether someone was entitled to view the tweet as homophobic, he said.

In his written judgment Sheriff Ross said: “Despite incorrectly implying that Mr Campbell is homophobic, her article is protected under the principle of fair comment.

“She is not liable to pay damages to Mr Campbell.”

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/kezia-dugdale-wins-homophobic-defamation-14385115?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar

Link to post
Share on other sites

I note that the satire within relevant tweet has been recognised by the court and effectively upheld within the overall proceedings.

 

I point this out for the benefit of those who sometimes mump and moan about the use of satire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, buster. said:

I note that the satire within relevant tweet has been recognised by the court and effectively upheld within the overall proceedings.

 

I point this out for the benefit of those who sometimes mump and moan about the use of satire.

Aw, bless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, buster. said:

I note that the satire within relevant tweet has been recognised by the court and effectively upheld within the overall proceedings.

 

I point this out for the benefit of those who sometimes mump and moan about the use of satire.

Being satirical and hypocritical aren't mutually exclusive  ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Bluedell said:

Being satirical and hypocritical aren't mutually exclusive  ?

Some may consider that better than being hypocritical without the satire.

Others that your use of hypo, is being somewhat hypo :D

 

In an often confusing age of instant, flying, massaged bullshit,... satire has become one of the most effective ways of cutting through the Knocker White. Good effective satire has a firm base in what is generally accepted as truth or something close to it.

 

 

Bottomline

Opinions are subjective and beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

Todays diviisions in society and messageboards will tend to determine whether X finds a joke/comedian funny.

 

 

One side of the division tends to have the political/commercial power, have been fcuking things up for decades BUT somehow want to blame those who haven't been anywhere near power during that time. 

Hence, the other side has a mountain of comic material for effective satire and produces the better comedians, both in number and quality.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.