Jump to content

 

 

[FT] St Johnstone 0 - 4 Rangers (Morelos 47; Goldson 61; Defoe 88, 90)


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, rbr said:

Should have been a St J goal , but fuck them , if the refs assistant can’t see it the ref can’t give it , need VAR for these incidents , but then we would have had a penalty , ohhhhh 4-0 lololol

Whole ball not over the line, no goal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rbr said:

Should have been a St J goal , but fuck them , if the refs assistant can’t see it the ref can’t give it , need VAR for these incidents , but then we would have had a penalty , ohhhhh 4-0 lololol

That was very close having seen from that goal line angle.  It was the correct decision as nobody could be sure that was over the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously the opening goal made all the difference as the game opened up after that and we took advantage by playing the ball quicker and took the chances when they came along.

 

Dallas did well at the opener to play advantage (not sure if the tackler was booked but should have been) but to not give a penalty for the handball is unforgivable.  Even the BT Sport ref thought it was and that's unusual when it comes to us.

 

After that Davis did brilliantly on the line to block what looked like a certain goal and squeaky bums for the last 5mins but we went up the park and scored two superb goals, though Defoe's second looked offside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Briton said:

That was very close having seen from that goal line angle.  It was the correct decision as nobody could be sure that was over the line.

No way the linesman could have gave it anyway as we had a man on the post blocking his view.

 

It was the right decision which will have Sutton and Craigan spewing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frankie said:

Obviously the opening goal made all the difference as the game opened up after that and we took advantage by playing the ball quicker and took the chances when they came along.

 

Dallas did well at the opener to play advantage (not sure if the tackler was booked but should have been) but to not give a penalty for the handball is unforgivable.  Even the BT Sport ref thought it was and that's unusual when it comes to us.

 

After that Davis did brilliantly on the line to block what looked like a certain goal and squeaky bums for the last 5mins but we went up the park and scored two superb goals, though Defoe's second looked offside.

Davis did very well not to handle that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Job done, took its time, as usual, but once these teams open up we get chances. Could have been more with Aribo heading unto the bar and Arfield through the masses and being denied by the goalie. But Goldson's header essentially secured the game, Defoe's couple was the icing on the cake. Good for morale and goal difference.

 

A bit strange for Dallas and the linesman to spot the ball not being over the line ... when they missed Davidson clear handball ... no matter inside or outside the area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frankie said:

Obviously the opening goal made all the difference as the game opened up after that and we took advantage by playing the ball quicker and took the chances when they came along.

 

Dallas did well at the opener to play advantage (not sure if the tackler was booked but should have been) but to not give a penalty for the handball is unforgivable.  Even the BT Sport ref thought it was and that's unusual when it comes to us.

 

After that Davis did brilliantly on the line to block what looked like a certain goal and squeaky bums for the last 5mins but we went up the park and scored two superb goals, though Defoe's second looked offside.

Think he did  get booked. 

 

Penalty decision is purely because he's been got at and rangers need to complain about that. 

 

Last goal is offside. 

 

A game of two halves and aribo and ojo still have much to prove. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.