BEARGER 1,829 Posted January 31, 2020 Author Share Posted January 31, 2020 2 minutes ago, craig said: They probably reset the voting. One would hope so anyway I’m sure they did, but it would have been a good idea to inform those who had already voted like me. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted February 2, 2020 Share Posted February 2, 2020 I've just voted for Christine. She would make an excellent, hard working addition to the board plus it would be good to have a board member who uses Gersnet. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted February 2, 2020 Author Share Posted February 2, 2020 You don’t need to use all 3 votes. I voted for Christine only. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted February 7, 2020 Author Share Posted February 7, 2020 POLL RESULT: Club 1872 Board Election 2020 Dear Member, The result of the Club 1872 Election is as follows: Laura Fawkes - 30.3% Alan Fraser - 24% Stuart MacQuarrie - 25.1% Christine Sommerville - 20.6% As a result, Laura Fawkes, Alan Fraser and Stuart MacQuarrie have been elected to the Club 1872 boards. We would like to congratulate the successful candidates and we are delighted to have a strong board in place to represent the organisation through what we hope will be a period of significant growth over the next few years. Thank you to all those who voted and to all our members for their ongoing support. Club 1872 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,146 Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 Good effort @plgsarmy Looks like it was a difficult task to get voted on given two people were already in place. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 Bad luck but it won't make a blind bit of difference who got elected. Club1872 is hemmed in on all sides, confined by its pedigree and its incredibly limited objectives. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post plgsarmy 111 Posted February 7, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 7, 2020 50 minutes ago, Frankie said: Good effort @plgsarmy Looks like it was a difficult task to get voted on given two people were already in place. I may say something later about the process Frankie and what I have experienced these last few weeks. 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 2 hours ago, Bill said: Bad luck but it won't make a blind bit of difference who got elected. Club1872 is hemmed in on all sides, confined by its pedigree and its incredibly limited objectives. On reflection I'd just like to add that, while I've never attached much importance to Club1872 and while there is an entire spectrum of reasons why people put themselves forward for these roles, I do think it's commendable where there are people who do so only for the good of the club and the supporters. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffer 1,665 Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 I didn't vote for anyone because I didn't see anything from any of the candidates that suggested why I should lend them my support. Did I miss something? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 9,360 Posted February 7, 2020 Share Posted February 7, 2020 49 minutes ago, Gaffer said: I didn't vote for anyone because I didn't see anything from any of the candidates that suggested why I should lend them my support. Did I miss something? You didn't vote for Gersnet's very own plgsarmy!? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.