Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Righteous Angry Mob.

 

Mob:. 

 

1 : a large and disorderly crowd of people especially : one bent on riotous or destructive action. 2 informal : a large number of people a mob of shoppers clogged the aisles a team greeted by mobs of fans. 3 : a criminal set : gang especially, often capitalized : mafia sense 1 a member of the Mob a mob informant

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Scott7 said:

Pair? There’s more than two of us.

Please accept my sincere apology.

 

The last thing that I would wish to do is prevent someone from self identifying as either righteous, angry or a combination of the two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, buster. said:

It isn't worth debating it with those two because they have previously shown that they equate disagreeing with Israeli Government Foreign Policy with anti-semitism. They seem like part of some strange, highly hypocritical and bipolar cult who just invent stuff and expect people just to except the absolute balderdash.

 

Can you imagine Bill on his Black, Black, Black thread if Diane Abbott accused Farage of being racist because he criticised a policy proposal. He would write chapter and verse on how stupid and dangerous it was and he would have a point. 

Funny that for another race, a different colour, a completely different attitude to racism.

 

Or Forlan on the SNP thread, if Sturgeon called a Tory out for racism after they criticised a political decision. 

He would probably dismiss them as Nationalist Nutters who are so desperate, they need to twist things back to calling out non-existant charges of racism and he would have a point.

Well, no such logic involved for invented cases of anti-semitism, no....instead the Imaginary Thought Polis seem to be brought in to help him declare something along the lines of 'we know what you are thinking'.

 

 

There is no debating with that kind of twisted shit.

They would call it out, they derserve to be called out for it.

 

 

The hypothetical examples I include above (Abbott and Sturgeon) are there to illustrate a point that was already made, ie. mind reading wasn't necessary, unlike the gift our two friends must have 😁

 

Note

Real proven cases of anti-semitism, just as any kind of racism, should obviously be taken seriously.

 

 

 

No. These should be real proven cases too, not accusations/insinuation in may of the cases blown up in the media. Ask Michael Vaughan about that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, buster. said:

Note

Real proven cases of anti-semitism, just as any kind of racism, should obviously be taken seriously.

 

I love the vulnerability expressed in the need to qualify everything you've written by endorsing orthodoxy 😁. You wouldn't want to risk being misunderstood after half a page of indecipherable spluttering 🤣 "It's language Jim, but not as we know it"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.