All Activity

Yes go for it

count me in

I plan to run a Euro 2024 prediction league, as is tradition now. A simpler and shorter game. Any interest?

Probably for the best.

A bit like our team I went way off form at the end , must do better

Bluedell (2.11) and T-1000 (1.96) had the best points-per-game (ppg) scores, which is impressive considering they both missed 4 games. FA1833 (1.65) and Stewarty (1.60) played very few games, but their ppg would get them into the top 10-12 if they played all games. Seven Maximums from Bluedell is just ridiculous. The second best tally is a group of seven with 2! Yorkie Bear, Ted McMinnime and 26th of foot were the best at hitting the Correct Result, with 41 each. Onevision, Lenny3k and Mack1950 were quite strong on this metric. Bluedell (22) and Ted McMinnime (20) were best at getting the Correct Number of Rangers Goals. Malangsob gets into the top 10 in this metric. Bluedell and Rousseau top the First Rangers Goalscorer charts, with 14. Graeme and SBG were also strong scorers in this metric. There was a group of four (Bluedell, T-1000, Yorkie Bear and 26th of foot) topping the Correct Score charts, with 9. BEARGER was a strong performer, too.

Players Pts GP PPG Max. CR CR% CRG CRG% FGS FGS% CS CS% Bluedell 116 55 2.11 7 39 66.10% 22 37.29% 14 23.73% 9 15.25% Yorkie Bear 109 59 1.85 2 41 69.49% 19 32.20% 11 18.64% 9 15.25% T-1000 108 55 1.96 2 40 67.80% 17 28.81% 12 20.34% 9 15.25% Rousseau 107 59 1.81 2 39 66.10% 19 32.20% 14 23.73% 7 11.86% Ted 106 59 1.80 2 41 69.49% 20 33.90% 12 20.34% 7 11.86% 26th of foot 104 57 1.82 1 41 69.49% 18 30.51% 9 15.25% 9 15.25% Devil 98 57 1.72 2 40 67.80% 15 25.42% 11 18.64% 7 11.86% SBG 95 55 1.73 1 37 62.71% 17 28.81% 13 22.03% 5 8.47% BEARGER 94 56 1.68 2 38 64.41% 16 27.12% 8 13.56% 8 13.56% compo 87 59 1.47 2 39 66.10% 15 25.42% 6 10.17% 7 11.86% Dado 85 59 1.44 1 38 64.41% 14 23.73% 6 10.17% 7 11.86% DJRFC 83 57 1.46 0 37 62.71% 14 23.73% 10 16.95% 4 6.78% r_s 77 53 1.45 1 34 57.63% 13 22.03% 9 15.25% 4 6.78% Malangsob 76 58 1.31 1 34 57.63% 17 28.81% 5 8.47% 5 8.47% lenny3k 75 59 1.27 0 38 64.41% 12 20.34% 8 13.56% 3 5.08% onevision 74 59 1.25 0 38 64.41% 9 15.25% 9 15.25% 3 5.08% CammyF 68 52 1.31 1 36 61.02% 13 22.03% 5 8.47% 3 5.08% Franc Ergs 67 50 1.34 0 33 55.93% 15 25.42% 5 8.47% 3 5.08% Graeme R 66 58 1.14 0 36 61.02% 5 8.47% 11 18.64% 1 1.69% MacK1950 65 59 1.10 0 38 64.41% 12 20.34% 3 5.08% 3 5.08% Bill 64 49 1.31 0 33 55.93% 10 16.95% 3 5.08% 5 8.47% ian1964 53 36 1.47 1 22 37.29% 6 10.17% 8 13.56% 3 5.08% TB 48 35 1.37 1 25 42.37% 7 11.86% 5 8.47% 2 3.39% MoodyBlue 48 37 1.30 0 25 42.37% 6 10.17% 4 6.78% 3 5.08% BSRT 40 29 1.38 0 17 28.81% 7 11.86% 5 8.47% 2 3.39% FA1833 28 17 1.65 0 13 22.03% 5 8.47% 5 8.47% 0 0.00% stewarty 24 15 1.60 0 8 13.56% 2 3.39% 4 6.78% 2 3.39% * Only includes those that played at least 15 games

I thought that it was a penalty. I don't think that the VAR Bhoys saw fit to review it. Scottish refereeing is a disgrace, with some officials quite clearly afraid to upset the fhilth; others make decisions based on what they were brought up to believe, that their team, since it's inception was regularly disadvantaged by officials. This is the ' always cheated, never defeated' mantra, the primary purpose of which was to maintain attendances at their matches, there being nothing like a community under siege mentality to rally the support. Now we see officials doing to other teams, primarily Rangers, what they think - what they have heard- was done to their team. Redress, they think. They think, too, that any non-Catholic official will, automatically, be biased against rasellik, which is nonsense, and offensive. Some are more blatant than others but even when it's benefit of the doubt, or very marginal calls, the default position is to favour one team. And now, we have Mr William Collum in charge of the whole shooting match. The question is why, when Scottish officials are of such low quality, that none ( no not one) of them will be officiating at the Euros, you would choose to appoint a current domestic referee to the most senior, and important, position, rather than bringing in someone from elsewhere, someone who might have the ideas and experience to improve matters?

Gave it to Diomande

Between Raskin, Diomande, Sterling and Balogun. Went for Balogun.

Went for Diomande, as he was easily our best players in the first half. I thought Balogun, Sterling and Raskin were pretty good too, overall.

Apparently Carter-Vickers is exempt from the new 'follow through' thought process on tackling.

Dessers' injury can't be that bad, as he played for c. 20 mins after the incident. Surely?

Erm......I forget.

Erm... I forgot. What are your thoughts?

This was my first though as well

I'd rather we died with our history than lived with the history of Paedo FC over at the Piggery. Of course, many of their demented fans spend their lives online claiming we did die but UEFA have stated, quite categorically, that we're the same club. Who would you believe: the game's governing body or unemployed Declan from Coatbridge?

Parks and Kings companies do not want to part with their finances. I get the feeling its an ego trip for them, if they wanted to bolster RFC with cash I would hope they would have done it before Celtic won 12 out of the last 13 this does not ring true for me WATP

This is an enlightening answer Atalanta was the second favourite to the Germans but they believed in themselves from the outset. Good answer