Jump to content

 

 

Bluedell

  • Posts

    17,292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    83

Posts posted by Bluedell

  1. 17 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

    Howcome? Nelms bought it back from the Dundee Utd director last October who had previously bought it at Dundee’s second administration & rented it to them.

    They own dens again but the notorious Mr Nelms keep promising them a new stadium which never seems to materialise 

    The drainage "can't be fixed unless someone provided the city council a multi-million budget to do so" is the reasoning given. :facepalm:

     

  2. 2 hours ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

    Its a bit strange how Dundee have tried to absolve themselves of all blame for this. As if its all out of their control and down to climate change or masons cloud seeding over dens but not tannadice.

    Apparently their stadium's drainage is not their responsibility. :rolleyes:

  3. 4 hours ago, Gonzo79 said:

    Sterling can replace Tav.  

    I'm not convinced about that. He looks far better in the midfield or even playing right wing. He can certainly cover but I wouldn't want him as our first choice right back for next season.

  4. 50 minutes ago, RANGERRAB said:

    It was a goal

     

    Var can only be used for fouls in the current phase of play. Two Celtic defenders had played the ball before Dessers scores. The ‘foul’ was committed in an earlier phase of play 

     

    var can only return to previous phases for red cards, violent conduct & mistake identity I believe. 

    2 defenders and the keeper played the ball.

     

    Stevie Clifford argued that attempted blocks and clearances doesn't change the phase of play. so the ref was correct to overturn the goal. I've not seen any references to rules that state that, but I think he did a bit of reffing, so he may know better than us, but I'd tend to agree with you.

  5. 4 hours ago, Rousseau said:

    Except for when he gave the ball away leading to their first, or when he was involved in the comedy of errors for their third?

    He constantly went back the way in the first half. We really suffered from having a right footed player at left back. Possibly not his fault but he wasn't particularly good in the first half, but a big improvement in the second.

  6. 28 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

    I think they go back to it because the end result was a goal, even if the referee did see it.

     

    I'll wait for Dermot at 11:00 before speculating, though.   

    It has to be a clear and obvious error. Compare and contrast to the handball in the game at Parkhead.

     

    I accept that there's an argument that it was that, but it also has to be in the same phase of play, and I'm not convinced it was. I'd have thought a new phase of play starts when the first cross is blocked

  7. 12 hours ago, RANGERRAB said:

    I’ve watched the Dessers disallowed goal again. Regards the ‘foul’ by Lawrence on Iwata(?), the referee is in a perfect position to see it (about 5 yards away) but allows play to continue. Presumably he felt Iwata went down too easily or dived.

    However Walsh & Connor on VAR were  having none of it

    The ref clearly saw it so was it an obvious error? I don't think it was.

     

    I also don't believe it was in the same phase of play, based on the way that the EPL is reffed, but I'm not clued up about the exact rules on that.

  8. 20 minutes ago, compo said:

    In my lifetime I don’t think I’ve seen a better sprinter if he’d have stopped looking across the line in the last ten meters he could have went faster.

    IMG_1106.jpeg.37f9c277fac750cc78bdf53aa28b1e97.jpeg

    Yeah, the number of times he didn't give his all by slowing down at the end was frustrating. I love watching athletes break records and he could have gone faster. For that reason, he falls short of being a hero of mine, despite his unique talent.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.