Jump to content

 

 

thesins

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    38

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. thesins
    As a BuyRangers member I would politely tell those involved with RangersFirst to gtf and leave the actual BuyRangers members to decide what to do with our shares. RangersFirst have no say at all over it and neither to SDS. It is massive arrogance from anyone to assume the BuyRangers members would want to do this.
  2. thesins
    Easdale owned very little shares but he had the backing of a large portion of the shareholders. Similar to Walter Smith and Malcolm Murray. Being on the board and owning shares are totally different. But ultimately the shareholders decide who is on the board so shareholding is where the real power is.
  3. thesins
    Or alternatively fans pump millions more into the club to be a member, vote on someone on the board (who is completely ignored) and the current inhabitants continue to pay themselves exorbitant bonuses with even more of the fans money. Membership works at clubs who have majority, or at least a large minority, level of ownership as then the membership has a proper say. I would back a membership scheme if I knew it was going to help the club but at the current time when we are leaking cash all over it would be the worst time possible to do so.
  4. thesins
    Lets hope Paul Le Guen is better at managing finances than he was a football team!
  5. thesins
    I can confirm I've received my GerSave money back. Sure others could too. Rumours like that with no basis which can be proven to be a lie do nobody any good. I'd like to see proof of any such allegations.
  6. thesins
    Are laws governing Industrial & Provident Societies not UK wide so not specific to Scotland? Also why would lawyers need to be present at a press launch? I know I wouldn't want to foot the bill for a partner in a law firm to come to Glasgow from, at closest Manchester, for what is really a photo opportunity. Maybe now someone has attempted an answer you could enlighten us with your own answer?
  7. thesins
    After reading that..kind of glad he didnt take over. Sounds like he was going to not spend much more than Hearts/Hibs and hire an American manager to get away from Western European influence.
  8. thesins
    Agreed 100%. I spend ages online and when the USP was formed it was big news on all sites. Then at my RSC meeting it wasn't even mentioned. Truth of the matter is vast majority of support don't care about groups and see any fighting or divisive statements as ridiculous and puts punters off the idea of groups altogether. Everyone that posts on forums or on twitter is a loony anyway. Quite right they are ignored!
  9. thesins
    A properly structured democratically system being implemented by the club right now could be ideal to bring the fans together as one unit. But it would have to be open to all and not along the lines of the USP statement which was childish. I'd hope also if the club endorsed a 100% democratic yet independent group new people might come forward to get over any of the old nonsense.
  10. thesins
    Seems a bit strange that two website (Rangers Media & CoplandRoad.org) had their names on the statement yet RM requested to be removed and CRO appear to not even have read it before it came out. Add to this RTID tweeting about wishing to be removed as they hadnt be consulted and its a very strange affair. How many people did see the USP statement before it was released with all these groups names on it?
  11. thesins
    So if we draw Celtic at Parkhead no Rangers fans should go and we let them fill it with 60k of their own kind? Bit premature I think.
  12. thesins
    If they read out the statement on their site then they were walking away from the whole process anyway so being asked to leave doesnt seem like a strange course of action to be honest. If they arent going to be involved in the process, and are actually looking to harm the process, its quite understandable that they were asked to leasve.
  13. thesins
    Surely part of the reason we are in the mess we are in is your first statement above? If the majority of the RST board, a democratic fan group, was to change would you still hold this opinion? The RST is what we the support make of it. It has the structure to be the one body if the fans decided they actually wanted a genuine 100% democratic fan group. Rangers Unite should probably change their name to Rangers Dis-Unite after walking out of a meeting consisting of other Rangers fan groups, independent government bodies and one of the few political allies we have.
  14. thesins
    I am undecided about renewing my season ticket but I can certainly understand calls to hold off renewing for now. After we all cautiously welcomed Whyte last year I am no longer willing to simply back the guy standing at Ibrox with a Rangers tie on and hope for the best. I want security and a certainty that the guys at the top have not ulterior motive. If we wait for players to leave, and possibly our manager to join them, then it will be too late. I also find it sad that the main focus for some appears to be one person's quotes contained within an article. John Macmillan also said the same as Mark Dingwall yet nobody seems to be mention that.
  15. thesins
    Fair enough with the work behind the scenes which goes un-noticed. I know many fans put in the time for these things and get no credit. Maybe they need to blow their own trumpet a bit more with updates on their website about what they have been doing. However I still think its poor that there isnt an option to choose individual away games on the form when we were told at the meeting that option would be available.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.