Jump to content

 

 

UCF2008

  • Posts

    2,018
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. As for this article, it's not surprising to see this rhag drudging up some dud foreign manager to take a pot shot at one of our flair players just as he starts to show some form. Neither is it surprising to see so many on here lapping it up and turning it on our manager.
  2. Most managers don't make substitutions until later in the game unless they're forced to, whether it's tactical or due to injury. At the weekend Ally made two substitutions before the 60th minute in response to us going behind for a second time. It could be argued that MacLeod was injured but regardless Ally made the right changes at the right time and we got the win as a result.
  3. Easdales aside with an investment committee chaired by Laxey's man Norman Chrighton, I don't think there will be any rush for a new share issue unless their holding is protected.
  4. Aye, if the spivs didnae pocket it all
  5. It's 29 pro youths to be precise and that's not counting the 4 under 20's in our 26 man first team squad.
  6. Mitchell was a decent prospect and was a standout in 2 or 3 of his 9 competitive appearances for us. Such a low number of appearances speaks volumes as to where he's fitted into our plans though. He was also one of five players who's contract expires in the Summer and his services were unlikely to be called upon in the remainder of the season. It makes sense for him to move on now. Best of luck to him
  7. Last I checked Durie was our U20 / Reserve team coach and doing a decent job of it too.
  8. Our opposition at this level are often credited with raising their game against us as though they were playing a cup final. Just for the sake of it I decided to check our stats on cup games against lower league sides... Rangers last 50 games in domestic cup competitions against lower league sides. (1997-2013)* Wins - 43 Won by a single goal - 12 Won by 2 goals - 7 Won by 3 goals - 9 Won by 4 goals - 6 Won by 5 goals or more – 9 Draws - 4 Defeats - 3 Lost by a single goal – 2 Lost by 2 goals – 1 * Not counting Ramsden Cup games. Lower league sides = Not SPL. Rangers last 50 league games Wins - 41 Won by a single goal - 7 Won by 2 goals - 15 Won by 3 goals - 9 Won by 4 goals - 6 Won by 5 goals or more - 4 Draws - 6 Defeats - 3 Lost by a single goal – 3 It's interesting to note that while we haven't been racking up cricket scores in just as many of our league games as those historical cup ties, this is balanced out by the number of games where far better Rangers squads only managed to scrape through by the skin of their teeth. All things considered, I'd say that overall we haven't been doing too badly at all. There is definitely room for improvement, but when is that never the case at Rangers?
  9. I can't see it happening this season unless forced, but I'd like to think we'll see regular 'rests' for Jig with Faure being phased in at CB next season.
  10. I think it depends on the reasoning behind moving players on. In some cases terminating a contract will be cheaper in the long term but very expensive in the short term. Reading between the lines in comments from CEO and not forgetting the '£1m left by April' quote from Stockbridge I don't think we can afford to be paying too many players off. Among the cheaper candidates on this front, Cribari is certainly surplus to requirements, is probably on a reasonably high wage and his contract is up in the summer. It possibly wouldn't be too expensive to reach an agreement for him to move on in January. Hutton is another who's contract is up in the summer and we have sufficient cover for central mid, so he could probably be let go. Perry is contracted till Summer 2015 and considering his extension was signed when we were in the SPL, he's likely earning far too much for an injury prone fringe player. Other than those three I don't see how we can afford to be forcing any cuts. That might change if we were to attract a fee for a player though.
  11. It can't be denied that there is an anti-McCoist element amongst our support who'll howl for his head whenever a result doesn't go our way. It's nothing new. However, what I would say is that over the past ten days or so the usual suspects and various other shit stirrers in the press HAVE clearly had 'the knives out' for Ally. Keevins obviously couldn't find a way to have a dig at Rangers while somehow shoe-horning Celtic into that story though, so we get this instead.
  12. None of the clubs we're playing against have 10% of our budget because they don't have 10% of our turnover. I also doubt any of the teams in our league have a player wage bill less than 5% of their turnover which is the level you're suggesting we should cut back to. Just because we've been forced to play against minnows doesn't mean we should reduce ourselves to that standard.
  13. I've read a few interesting quotes from Malcolm Murray over the past couple of days. In comparison to his pre AGM rants they make more sense and he also poses some valid questions. It does seem a bit odd for him to start making a valuable contribution to the debate after the AGM though. Too little too late if you ask me.
  14. In fairness we signed Cribari because we had a short space of time to bring in an experienced centre-half on a free last summer. With us looking to move on Boca and Goian we'd have had no experienced players there at all. In hindsight we could probably have gotten a cheaper and better option from a lower league side, but you can't blame the coaching staff for taking a look at the player and his CV and thinking he'd fit the bill. I agree we could have managed without Foster. Mitchell did a decent job at RB last season. Faure's done a good job there this season and we also still had Darren Cole at the time. There's not much experience between them but it seems to be historically a position which doesn't bother our managers too much on that front. Smith is debatable because we had no established cover for LB. We made some good signings this summer, but arguably even some of the best ones were unnecessary. Some of our best young players have been pushed out of position or struggled for game time as a result. As for the fans being more excited by young players, that's fine so long as the players are exciting enough to watch in the first place never mind once the novelty wears off. Some fans claim to have the patience for the inconsistency of performance that tends to come hand in hand with an inexperienced side. In general though, I think us Rangers fans are far too used to winning and anything less (particularly at this level) wouldn't be accepted.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.