Jump to content

 

 

Zappa

  • Posts

    27,246
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Zappa

  1. Another great read Frankie. :tu:

     

    I know the team has a few issues which need addressed, but personally I think one of the major factors which has caused us to stumble, go off the boil or whatever folk want to call it, is simply the international breaks literally interrupting and breaking our squad's rhythm and momentum.

  2. Thanks a million for sorting this out guys. I've been meaning to do it, but completely forgot yesterday and today because the last few weeks have been total chaos for my dad & I trying to organise & prepare their house for my mum getting out of hospital after a 15 week stay.

  3. Not for me. Each to their own I suppose.

     

    I think we've touched on this before, but anyway.... If the legal and judicial system is still essentially based around the premise of innocent until proven guilty, should the police not somehow take that into account themselves? Fair enough, the police maybe don't have an easy job at times, but it's a job which does require a degree of something we've heard a lot about very recently, namely 'common sense'.

    '

  4. If my brother was a thug/nutter/clown, going on a night out with him would be the last thing I'd do. Thugs/nutters/clowns with alcohol in them are even bigger thugs/nutters/clowns.

     

    I did add the caveat of 'or whatever' because I have no idea if his brother is a 'thug/nutter/clown' or something else. That was essentially one of my points because I can only presume that neither you or anyone else posting on Gersnet know the full facts & story here and I certainly don't myself either.

     

    Don't get me wrong, I can understand why you would want to be judgmental because you're a cop. It's part of your job (and maybe nature) to judge peoples' actions, but in this particular situation where you're not in a position of having to make a snap/quick judgement, would it not be prudent to give Nicky Clark the benefit of the doubt and follow the premise of 'innocent until proven guilty'?

  5. I didn't listen to it all mate,I never do,however some of the times I have listened in previously he seems lost with some of the facts!,he did a lot better this time,I'm just saying he should make sure he is spot on with every detail.

     

    Aye, he does get it wrong at times from what little bits I've heard mate. I listened to all of Friday night's show from just before DJ made those comments, but when I tune in it's normally just for half an hour or so on the way home and it's not really that often, so thankfully I probably miss most of the times when the big man is talking rubbish or doesn't know what to say. It can't be easy for him on that show though because he's got a lot of drunken idiots & loony tune crackpots to deal with at times.

  6. Won't be judging him but this definitely isn't the kind of thing a Rangers player should be getting involved in, at the very least he needs to be more careful

     

    Again, I'm not defending him, but what should we regard as worse from a football perspective: A player on a night out somehow caught with his brother who was for some unknown reason carrying a knife or players who gamble on football matches and also allegedly take drugs?

     

    I'm not saying we should start talking about ifs and buts and pointing fingers, although it's fair to say that the Club has defended and stood by players who knowingly put themselves in considerably worse situations than this.

  7. I don't know why any of us should think we're in a position to judge Nicky Clark when we don't have enough information to properly form an opinion on it.

     

    His brother might be a thug/nutter/clown or whatever, but that wouldn't mean Nicky can't treat him like the family he is and go for a night out with him.

     

    That said, I'm not defending the lad either and I'm not so sure Mark Warburton will look too kindly on these type of headlines about one of his players.

  8. I'm a bit uncomfortable with the inclusion of the RFFF. It should be kept independent.

     

    The RFFF is maybe being dragged into the equation/discussions because it's linked with the Assembly, but I don't understand why the Assembly would need to continue under any newly proposed umbrella group when being an umbrella group was the raison d'etre of the Assembly in the first place.

     

    You'd think any technical issues (RFFF monies for example) could be overcome and a new umbrella group could just replace the Assembly.

     

    Obviously it's a complex situation though, so I might be viewing it too simplistically.

  9. Its the need for corroboration he proposed scrapping Zap and he was rightly condemned for it. But then again why rely on corroboratory evidence when you can just defer to "common sense"

     

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/lord-carloway-under-fire-over-corroboration-plans-1-3109928#axzz3qYoTGK00

     

    You're right D'Art, thanks. I must have been recalling reading articles or quotes within articles discussing the possible ramifications on the presumption of innocence principle. Anyway, Lord Carloway is clearly on a different planet from most other humans.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.