wabashcannonball

Simple question and still unanswered, one that explains the whole fiasco...... why, if they did indeed change their stance on matters, did the auditors do so, also has the rst not had a CA on the board for several months, if so what is and was that CA's take on the matter. ........................................................... PS...how others see things.... Grandmaster_Suck http://tinyurl.com/FollowFollowFacebook Join Date: 06-03-2005 Location: The Disco Inferno Posts: 14,737 Re: Trust statement Quote: Originally Posted by forlanssister Ok i'll bite and mention the elephant in the room. Would it not be for the greater good of the RST as a whole,and it's long term aims, if the Dingwall chap to resign from the board? *prepares to be thrashed with the banning stick* It's juvenile to tie your arguement to martyrdom. I have of course considered that course whilst the Trust Board was under the lash of Mr Harris's assorted threats to wreak havoc. However, giving into such dishonesty would not have been decent and it would have been deserting my colleagues who would have still had to cope with his behaviour.

As long as you aint a fuk faced fat greedy banker bastardo, raping the public as a customer and a taxpayer, come the glorious day, them fuks will be the first against the wa'.....

And still are, despite the sugar daddies.

Well I can play the moothie and the spoons, the spoons would be useful fer stirring it, would these specialist skills be of use...:fish:

I was told once by a famous Glasgow Rabbi, "there is only truth all else is untruth", it has served me well through the years, death is absolute, just like life and truth.

I thought it was rather apt, since we are all going round in circles (well some are) asking questions but failing to find answers. I was old in 1970. ,,,,,,,,,, so let's go round again... if only our fitba' players were as talented... [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKrwbs5xqqc]YouTube - "Let's Go Round Again" by Average White Band - Disco Video Mix by Glenn Rivera[/ame]

Two sides no middle ...in the real world..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki2VMALEPc0]YouTube - The Moody Blues - Question[/ame]

izat you frank.... [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miG3Db-1-pI]YouTube - Faith, Mr Spencer - Some Mothers Do 'Ave 'Em - BBC classic comedy[/ame]

What's with the truth somewhere in the middle pish, it's either true or it isn't, it's a bit like a little bit dead... and both sides cannot be right.... go on somebody tell us they could be.......

zats awrite am pished anyhows....

rst........

We or rather the english are on the road to ruin........the danger is that they may suck us into their house of cards, with promises of untold riches, which is in truth crippling debt. The warning signs are there for all to see. They will need us.... the Old Firm.... more than we will need them. Manchester City have swept past Manchester United in the pay league for players, the club's annual report revealed. The figures also show details of City's astonishing spending spree on players and salaries which have led to record losses of �£121.3million. Although City's turnover increased by 40% to �£125m this has been swamped by total salary costs of �£133.3m, a �£50m rise on a year ago. That puts City - bankrolled by Abu Dhabi-based owner Sheikh Mansour - ahead of United, whose wage bill is �£123m, and Arsenal (�£110m) and closing in fast on Chelsea (�£142m). City chief executive Garry Cook said the losses "should come as no surprise" but that the club would now scale back on new signings.

The trust should be fekked ower the heid wi' a large mallet, we can then enjoy the fitba....

Nah, it will be easy....at least one of them is a slippery geezer.... :spl:

I'll see if I can fit you in between Frankie and Grandmastersuck...........:box:

ave hud hunners, you'll be owertakin me at this rate, you must deliver your insult with the required degree of disdain and opprobrium...:fish:

Jings calamity Jane..## One of the RST Boardââ?¬â?¢s leading lights stated one yesterday afternoon on Ã?£Ã?£.......... ââ?¬Å?The Trust and a backer were in talks. Talks became very positive and a document was submitted to the bank. It found it's way from there to the club and then was leaked. Someone at the club leaked it to damage the whole process, then ordered a three day media spin about how it couldn't work.ââ?¬Â He's a card that Minty so he is, he wisny born yesterday...

Nah, thats the wan where the goalposts are moved to suit, usually to a grey area created by the grey suits..... wunner if Bluedell is gonny spill the beans...

They wiz Masonic auditors that's ok then... cover yir work at all times... even in private.. :fish:

You will be telling me next that there is no such thing as a simple difference between right and wrong, thankfully the great majority of people are not so easily fooled, i.e. right is right and proper, wrong is just plain wrong to the extent of in many cases being illegal...but the wordsmiths like to inhabit their own little world, where all is safe and grey..:box:

sorted that....

RSA...?????.... you mean the RSA that released a statement beginning........ CLUB OWNERSHIP Andrew Ellis has held talks with Donald Muir and with Sir David Murray and has provided proof of funds. However, the Chairman indicated that the Board has, as yet, received no firm details of the Ellis proposals or indeed had any discussion with him. You can see the contradiction...or incompetence ? Agendas are like opinions and arseholes........just depends how big and how open....

That appears to be the crux of the matter BH,...... to the rank and file all we have to go on is speculation.... a very good reason why the rst should be liquidated, certainly one way of drawing a line under the "speculation".

No BH, it doesn't, the claim has been made that MD was in receipt of a business plan/proposal from ellis, that is either true or it is bollox, if by some extreme chance it is true, that document was obviously withheld, as you clearly state you had and have no knowledge of any such document in your tenure as an executive member. Simple equation looks as if, again if this alleged document existed, said executive committee was no more than a sop given by those who wield the real power in the rsa............just another possible example of alleged duplicity.....stinks doesn't even begin to cover it. You were the rst official contact with ellis were you not.