wabashcannonball

So there is no laws for the manky rich or parameters for cooking their books, only chains and bread and water for the proletariat, and the sweat of their brow to furnish the lifestyles of the idle rich, and useless bastardos known as MP'S, who rape the proletariat daily and regally, that is the trouble with this society......responsibility carries no responsibility......only perks and the power to blame every fuker else, Uncle Joe had a point.

Only if you staun oan wan leg....:robbo:

Aye....but can you play it on the flute......

VB or at least two of their members are promising news of some variety and have been for over two days, but for reasons of national security and obligations to Ladbrokes are unable to divulge this "atomic" news, therefore I have ordered all bell ends to stand down from defcon 1 and have reappraised the situation to damp squib status,,,,,,,:fish:

In this case would any of those varying opinions get you arrested for pocklin', but.......having thought about that, it appears the last thing anyone gets porridge for...from graspin' fat greedy banking bastardos tae fat greedy graspin MP bastardos is pocklin'........... except of course unless it is wee Ina moppin a few closes tae but her weans claes or feed them. then the fekers dae her right left an centre, cos she is oan the social,,,, whit a fekin fuked up country...and don't start me on sharia law....

Of course it has relevance....if that is a genuine professional opinion, again that raises the question as to why the accounts were put through unqualified, I may be simple but even I can see that both opinions can't be correct, or even meet in the middle....so my question is, should anyone have signed of these accounts as they were presented ?

Thanks BH, I am probably a wee bit longer in the tooth than you, so being up at 4.00 am is a regular thing with uncertain waterworks, the joys of auld age...allegedly..

Thanks BH appreciated, can you give your view on what you thought to be the bolded, if not, I hope you don't mind me asking, if we all understood your concerns it may clarify the situation for all, thanks again, sorry if I sound invasive.

So not a CA.

It's better than fekin Wall Street...HHB is givin yon willhelm gadjie a serious seeing to..keep the fires burnin Boss...:box:

Can you enlarge on your objections to the accounts, and possible damage to your reputation by sanctioning said accounts. Why would the auditor(s) sign off said accounts, apparently they had no fear that in doing so they would endanger their professional standing, code of ethics or infringe any other statute. What exactly was and is your fear of what you perceive to be irregular/compromised with regard to the accounts. The simple equation is straightforward, either you or the auditor(s) are mistaken in your conclusions, if the auditor(s) are the mistaken/culpable party, that in itself raises very very serious questions....so which of you is mistaken, both of you cannot be right. Also are you able to say what your professional qualifications are, thanks BH, just would like to be clear on the issues.

Aye you an me both m8, pity it is givin the mhanks absolute shedloads of ammo....

Are you nitpickin....

I know I shouldn't laff, but this is turning into something of a spectator sport, had a look on RM, hillheadbear is handing out a singular and severe lesson to the lightweights taking him on, laff I couldn't stop...... what a fekin david essex... :fish:

Only as nuisance value pokerface, but we have that anyway, thank fuk the Chelski gemme is on.

Ellis who the fek is Ellis.......... [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eIS5f5qx9A]YouTube - Roy Chubby Brown - Alice Alice (Who The Fuck Is Alice)[/ame] http://tinyurl.com/2fmman4

I am confused, what has his worth got to do with the price of a pan loaf.... :spl:

What a fekin bag of spanners........ :yawn:

Read all about it !!!!!!!! The Board of the Rangers Supporters Trust deplores the cynical, inaccurate and grossly exaggerated claims made on internet forums by former Secretary Alan Harris. The claims relate to monies totalling �£2690 which had been due to the RST for an extended period of time after being pledged by a Board member (Mark Dingwall). The background to this is that Mr. Dingwall had committed to underwrite the selling of tables and some other incidental items at two Rangers-related dinners for good causes in 2008. Mr. Dingwall was unable to sell the seats immediately and as the RST had organised the events, he was therefore deemed liable for the outstanding monies. Due to business pressures, Mr. Dingwall was unable to repay the balance immediately and two cheques were returned from the bank. All of the outstanding money was subsequently paid by Mr. Dingwall and the account is settled. The Trust board then commissioned independent legal advice to probe Mr Harris's claims, and Mark Dingwall and Trust Chair Stephen Smith voluntarily withdrew from Board duties in order to facilitate an independent investigation. While Mr Dingwall was cleared of the allegation of making any financial gain, legal advice stated that the issue should have been highlighted sooner as, while monies were overdue, it could reasonably be deemed to be a conflict of interest. The legal advice concluded that it would be "unreasonable" to ask Mr Dingwall to resign in this instance and the Board agreed that he acted in good faith from the outset and far from profiting he was in fact ultimately, personally out of pocket. The Trust Board accepts the legal advice in full and has already put in place a series of improvements in its financial management procedures which will enable the RST to move forward with more robust controls, visibility and reporting. Recent internet posts from Mr Harris claiming to quote from the Auditors Report (which exists for the purpose of advising the Trust's Board) are factually inaccurate. None of these quotes were included in the report - in fact these quotes substantially reflect or derive from draft amendments which Mr. Harris himself sought to have included in the Auditors report, in order to reflect his own opinions and further his own goals. These amendments were rejected by the Auditors and Board following receipt of the legal advice. The Auditor fully signed-off the RST's accounts on an unqualified basis and the Board accepted the Report, implementing more robust financial procedures in the process. The Trust Board is deeply disappointed at a deliberate and premeditated breach of confidentiality. We do not accept that this is either whistleblowing or in any way justifiable behaviour. Mr Harris has stated his opinions without context on a public message-board, instead of raising these questions at the Trust's Annual General Meeting on 19 September - a meeting he elected to walk out of after only 15 minutes rather than wait for the 'open-floor' section of the meeting when the Chair had already indicated to Mr Harris he could express his opinions. The RST Board will now consider the actions necessary, including disciplinary action, to take the Trust forward.

This forum is famed for its lack of misinformation, and its adherence to the Presbyterian tenet of fact above fiction {virgin births an awe yon sort o stuff}, no one has claimed anything is going to happen, only that as with all things, it may.

Naw naw, he's the pope is he no, widny be allowed or would it.... :fish:

Amen to that.

Have heard the meeja have started sniffing about, seems like their collective noses are seriously out of joint, as they never had the slightest about it or even knew who he was, which I admit is not a crime. Heard snippets of this for the last couple of weeks, but nothing concrete, my own thoughts are that the Mint would like nothing more than a big bag of, as usual, someone else's money, to dump on the bank's table and tell them to get tae, a fantasy perhaps, but not one I would put past the Mint.

The best that I can get so far is that HH manages and directs more money than many countries national budgets, that money is apparently invested in various avenues on his say so/advice and discretion. I was always told that it is the quiet ones you have to watch. As far as I am led to believe his clout is a lot more than any banks, sort of George Soros level, but not as ruthless.....allegedly. Whither he would see us or MIH as an investment opportunity only he and Murray will know.

Thank you BH. I still think it is a storm in a teacup, but of course many teacups can add up to a Tsunami.